Hi - There are several linked privacy policies in Fennec - all should point to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/legal/privacy/firefox.html (except in Health Report which should go to the specific section in the same policy).
Is this bug referring to the URL assigned to app.privacyURL?
We did update the link in about:rights in bug 874888, but Aaron is correct that we need to update the app.privacyURL pref, which is used in about:firefox. Jishnu, do you know of any other in-product privacy links we may have missed? I'm going to steal this as a good first bug for the intern we have starting today.
Created attachment 767507 [details] [diff] [review] Patch homogenising privacy links The actual URL we´re after here is `https://www.mozilla.org/legal/privacy/firefox.html`, as the website does slightly clever redirection to go to the appropriate locale (And we don´t want to redirect everyone to the en-US version). There was one incorrect URL - patch attached.
Comment on attachment 767507 [details] [diff] [review] Patch homogenising privacy links (When requesting review, you should specify a reviewer. In this case, it's me :)
Comment on attachment 767507 [details] [diff] [review] Patch homogenising privacy links Looks good to me!
I'm setting the checkin-needed keyword on this bug, which means that a kind soul with commit access will come along and land this patch for you :)
Thanks - I did add you as the reviewer, but I used your email address not your name, causing bugzilla to blithley inform me itś truncated the field and carried on. Whoops.
(In reply to Chris Kitching from comment #7) > Thanks - I did add you as the reviewer, but I used your email address not > your name, causing bugzilla to blithley inform me itś truncated the field > and carried on. Whoops. You need to use the bugzilla id of the reviewer, which is an email address. Pro tip: Many people also add handle shortcuts to their name to make autocomplete easier (e.g. for me, you can just type ":marg" and I'll be the only result that comes up :).
How uplift-able is this? I'm thinking since we are shipping FHR for the first time in Fx23, we might need this as far up as beta for consistency.
(In reply to Erin Lancaster [:elancaster] from comment #11) > How uplift-able is this? I'm thinking since we are shipping FHR for the > first time in Fx23, we might need this as far up as beta for consistency. This is totally upliftable, since it's a pref, not a string. Want me to request uplift? (The patch for bug 874888 is also good to uplift, since the URL there is just hardcoded into some HTML.)
Yes, let's request uplift for both. (thank you!).
Comment on attachment 767507 [details] [diff] [review] Patch homogenising privacy links [Approval Request Comment] Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): this isn't a regression, but we'd like to uplift it because FHR will be part of 23, and we want users to be able to access privacy policies easily User impact if declined: privacy policies are incorrectly linked Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): landed on m-c Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): low risk, just updates a link URL String or IDL/UUID changes made by this patch: n/a
Verified fixed on: Build: Firefox for Android 25.0a1(2013-07-18) Firefox for Android 24.0a2 Firefox for Android 23.0b2 Device: LG Nexus 4 OS: Android 4.2.2