Closed
Bug 890728
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
ReferenceError: __flash__argumentsToXML is not defined - Picture Upload Button (Everytrail.com) does not lead to the expected File Open Dialog Box
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Plug-ins, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: tinl, Unassigned)
Details
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:22.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/22.0 (Beta/Release)
Build ID: 20130618035212
Steps to reproduce:
1. Login to my account on www.everytrail.com
2. Navigate to an uploaded trip
3. ``Edit pictures and videos´´ refer to <http://www.everytrail.com/edit_pictures.php?trip_id=aTripId>, in order to populate the trip with pictures, that could be uploaded an positioned
Actual results:
Nothing
Expected results:
File Open Dialog Box should appear
- Firefox 22.0
- Windows XP Professional
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Thanks for reporting this!
Have you ever had this problem with previous Firefox versions?
Does the web console show you an error message? (Tools > Web Developer > Web Console)
1. do not remember if this ever did occur with former versions
2. I did mention the steps to reproduce.
3. ... but:
after opening the Web Console and even closing it afterwards: everthing work as expected! Restarting firefox without opening the Web Console results in the behavior mentioned in my inital bug report dated 2013-07-07 12:23:29 PDT.
4. opening the Web Console shows:
[23:24:47.542] ReferenceError: __flash__argumentsToXML is not defined @ http://www.everytrail.com/js/common/mootools-1.2.5-core-jm.js:115
NB: the second time, it does not work even if Web Console is opened
Updated•12 years ago
|
Summary: Picture Upload Button (Everytrail.com) does not lead to the expected File Open Dialog Box → ReferenceError: __flash__argumentsToXML is not defined - Picture Upload Button (Everytrail.com) does not lead to the expected File Open Dialog Box
Updated•11 years ago
|
Component: Untriaged → Plug-ins
Product: Firefox → Core
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Unfortunately due to the complexity of Flash and Firefox, it's going to be pretty hard to debug this with a large testcase like this. However, it would help if you can run some tests and help us figure out when this broke in our nightly builds. That will help us see which changes might have caused an issue (or if this is perhaps an issue caused by a Flash upgrade instead of a Firefox upgrade):
http://mozilla.github.io/mozregression/ is a tool which can help find the regression range.
Flags: needinfo?(tinl)
1. The bug is for me not reproducable anymore. I have Shockwave Flash 11.8.800.94 installed now. What I had before is not known.
2. The http://mozilla.github.io/mozregression/ did not report any bad nightly affected. See below.
3. http://mozilla.github.io/mozregression/ needs to be improved: start-l10n.bat does not work with path names with blanks!
4. The inconveniences might have been initiated by:
- Shockwave Flash
- other installed plug-ins/add-ons
Output from mozregression:
$ mozregression
No 'good' date specified, using 2009-01-01
Downloading nightly from 2011-05-03
Installing nightly
Starting nightly
Was this nightly good, bad, or broken? (type 'good', 'bad', 'skip', 'retry', or
'exit' and press Enter): good
Downloading nightly from 2012-07-02
Installing nightly
Starting nightly
Was this nightly good, bad, or broken? (type 'good', 'bad', 'skip', 'retry', or
'exit' and press Enter): good
Downloading nightly from 2013-01-31
Installing nightly
Starting nightly
Was this nightly good, bad, or broken? (type 'good', 'bad', 'skip', 'retry', or
'exit' and press Enter): good
Downloading nightly from 2013-05-17
Installing nightly
Starting nightly
Was this nightly good, bad, or broken? (type 'good', 'bad', 'skip', 'retry', or
'exit' and press Enter): good
Downloading nightly from 2013-07-09
Installing nightly
Starting nightly
Was this nightly good, bad, or broken? (type 'good', 'bad', 'skip', 'retry', or
'exit' and press Enter): good
Downloading nightly from 2013-08-05
Installing nightly
Starting nightly
Was this nightly good, bad, or broken? (type 'good', 'bad', 'skip', 'retry', or
'exit' and press Enter): good
Downloading nightly from 2013-08-18
Installing nightly
Starting nightly
Was this nightly good, bad, or broken? (type 'good', 'bad', 'skip', 'retry', or
'exit' and press Enter): good
Downloading nightly from 2013-08-25
Installing nightly
Starting nightly
Was this nightly good, bad, or broken? (type 'good', 'bad', 'skip', 'retry', or
'exit' and press Enter): good
Downloading nightly from 2013-08-28
Installing nightly
Starting nightly
Was this nightly good, bad, or broken? (type 'good', 'bad', 'skip', 'retry', or
'exit' and press Enter): good
Downloading nightly from 2013-08-30
Installing nightly
Starting nightly
Was this nightly good, bad, or broken? (type 'good', 'bad', 'skip', 'retry', or
'exit' and press Enter): good
Downloading nightly from 2013-08-31
Installing nightly
Starting nightly
Was this nightly good, bad, or broken? (type 'good', 'bad', 'skip', 'retry', or
'exit' and press Enter): good
Last good nightly: 2013-08-31
First bad nightly: 2013-09-01
Pushlog:
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?startdate=2013-08-31&enddate=2
013-09-01
do you want to bisect further by fetching the repository and building? (y or n)
n
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Closing for now, let us know if you can consistently reproduce this or have any further information.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago → 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
Updated•3 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•