Closed
Bug 895141
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Remove prlong.h inclusions from the tree
Categories
(Core :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla25
People
(Reporter: ehsan.akhgari, Assigned: ehsan.akhgari)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
8.94 KB,
patch
|
jcranmer
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #777402 -
Flags: review?(Pidgeot18)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
I don't suppose you could also take a thrashing to the LL_ macros used from prlong.h while you're at it: <http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?limit=100&redirect=false&q=regexp%3A%2F\bLL_%2F%20-path%3Ansprpub%2F%20-path%3Asecurity%2Fnss%2F>?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> I don't suppose you could also take a thrashing to the LL_ macros used from
> prlong.h while you're at it:
> <http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?limit=100&redirect=false&q=regexp%3A%2F\bLL_%2F%20-path%3Ansprpub%2F%20-path%3Asecurity%2Fnss%2F>?
Would you object to me doing that in another bug? These inclusions are unnecessary regardless.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
FWIW a ton of this work was done in bug 795351 among others.
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to :Ehsan Akhgari (needinfo? me!) from comment #4)
> Would you object to me doing that in another bug? These inclusions are
> unnecessary regardless.
Not at all.
(In reply to :Ehsan Akhgari (needinfo? me!) from comment #5)
> FWIW a ton of this work was done in bug 795351 among others.
And like the mass prtypes-removal bug, uses of these macros tend to creep in every now and again.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to :Ehsan Akhgari (needinfo? me!) from comment #4)
> > Would you object to me doing that in another bug? These inclusions are
> > unnecessary regardless.
>
> Not at all.
Bug 895168.
> (In reply to :Ehsan Akhgari (needinfo? me!) from comment #5)
> > FWIW a ton of this work was done in bug 795351 among others.
>
> And like the mass prtypes-removal bug, uses of these macros tend to creep in
> every now and again.
Yes. :( I think we need to stop including nspr.h to fix that.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #777402 -
Flags: review?(Pidgeot18) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla25
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•