Closed
Bug 900988
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Re-image 24 bld-linux64-ix machines as win64 builders
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations :: RelOps: General, task)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: armenzg, Assigned: arich)
References
Details
I've disabled all of these slaves and gracefully shut down them. Please do not re-image them until 3 hours have passed from the time of filing this bug. How can I disable the nagios check for them? Many thanks. From try, 11 of them: bld-linux64-ix-038 bld-linux64-ix-039 bld-linux64-ix-040 bld-linux64-ix-041 bld-linux64-ix-042 bld-linux64-ix-043 bld-linux64-ix-044 bld-linux64-ix-045 bld-linux64-ix-046 bld-linux64-ix-047 bld-linux64-ix-048 bld-linux64-ix-049 bld-linux64-ix-050 From build, 13 of them: bld-linux64-ix-004 bld-linux64-ix-015 bld-linux64-ix-016 bld-linux64-ix-017 bld-linux64-ix-018 bld-linux64-ix-019 bld-linux64-ix-020 bld-linux64-ix-021 bld-linux64-ix-022 bld-linux64-ix-023 bld-linux64-ix-024 bld-linux64-ix-025 bld-linux64-ix-026 The new names should be: w64-ix-slave134 w64-ix-slave135 w64-ix-slave136 w64-ix-slave137 w64-ix-slave138 w64-ix-slave139 w64-ix-slave140 w64-ix-slave141 w64-ix-slave142 w64-ix-slave143 w64-ix-slave144 w64-ix-slave145 w64-ix-slave146 w64-ix-slave147 w64-ix-slave148 w64-ix-slave149 w64-ix-slave150 w64-ix-slave151 w64-ix-slave152 w64-ix-slave153 w64-ix-slave154 w64-ix-slave155 w64-ix-slave156 w64-ix-slave157
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
These are going to require a bunch of back end infrastructure (vlan, dns, dhcp, nagios) changes, so we probably won't get to these till next week.
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: relops → qfortier
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: qfortier → arich
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Okay, getting back to this, you say you're repurposing 24 total, 11 from try, but you list 13 machines there (26 total). Which should actually be repurposed?
Flags: needinfo?(armenzg)
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Amy Rich [:arich] [:arr] from comment #2) > Okay, getting back to this, you say you're repurposing 24 total, 11 from > try, but you list 13 machines there (26 total). Which should actually be > repurposed? Sorry about that. You can skip 49 & 50. I will update slavealloc's note.
Flags: needinfo?(armenzg)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
The following machines have been reimaged: w64-ix-slave135 w64-ix-slave136 w64-ix-slave137 w64-ix-slave138 w64-ix-slave139 w64-ix-slave140 w64-ix-slave141 w64-ix-slave142 w64-ix-slave143 w64-ix-slave145 w64-ix-slave146 w64-ix-slave147 w64-ix-slave148 w64-ix-slave149 w64-ix-slave150 w64-ix-slave151 w64-ix-slave152 w64-ix-slave153 w64-ix-slave154 w64-ix-slave155 w64-ix-slave156 w64-ix-slave157 These two are waiting for hands on by dcops: w64-ix-slave134 w64-ix-slave144
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
This caused Wed 08:20:37 PDT [4574] nagios1.private.releng.scl3.mozilla.com:scl1-bld-linux64-ix-ping cluster is UNKNOWN: Could not parse arguments (http://m.allizom.org/scl1-bld-linux64-ix-ping+cluster) :arr can you drop the cluster check entirely when you get a chance? (ashish claims the alert happens because we removed all hosts from the cluster, I believe him)
Flags: needinfo?(arich)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
cluster check removed, and the last couple hosts reimaged according to sub-bug.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(arich)
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•