Open
Bug 901299
Opened 11 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
Consider requiring GetParentObject to return a ParentObject
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Bindings (WebIDL), defect, P5)
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: bzbarsky, Unassigned)
Details
In bug 887533 we had to add a bunch of includes to headers because bindings code has no way to know what the return type of GetParentObject is. I think we should consider requiring that GetParentObject return a ParentObject struct, and make all GetParentObject implementations that need extra includes not inline.... It'll mean one extra OOL call during wrapping, and is a bit more user-hostile, but that might be ok.
Flags: needinfo?(peterv)
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
As long as we don't make ParentObject constructors explicit, fine by me :-).
Flags: needinfo?(peterv)
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1472046 Move all DOM bugs that haven’t been updated in more than 3 years and has no one currently assigned to P5. If you have questions, please contact :mdaly.
Priority: -- → P5
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
Reporter | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Component: DOM: Core & HTML → DOM: Bindings (WebIDL)
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•