[B2G][Helix][sms][zhaotao]The Back icon is too small

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 821673

Status

P2
normal
RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 821673
5 years ago
5 years ago

People

(Reporter: lecky.wanglei, Unassigned)

Tracking

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

Attachments

(1 attachment)

(Reporter)

Description

5 years ago
Created attachment 792643 [details]
device.png

User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; aff-kingsoft-ciba; Zune 4.7)

Steps to reproduce:

1.open sms app
2.open a sms conversation session


Actual results:

in step 2,the back icon is too small,please check the attachment file


Expected results:

The back icon should be largger,for better user experience
(Reporter)

Updated

5 years ago
Component: General → Gaia::SMS
Priority: -- → P3
This isn't a security bug.
Group: core-security
(Reporter)

Updated

5 years ago
blocking-b2g: --- → hd?
(Reporter)

Updated

5 years ago
Severity: normal → blocker
Priority: P3 → P2
(Reporter)

Comment 2

5 years ago
hi,jason,

i know this is not a security bug,

will you fix it?
(Reporter)

Comment 3

5 years ago
hi,wayne,

can you check the issue?

Is this by design and you will not fix it on V1.1?
(Reporter)

Updated

5 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(wchang)
This is by design. However, the actual tap area is bigger than the back icon itself, therefore there is not a "too small" problem.

Note that this has been redesigned for 1.3 in bug 821673. koi? has been asked on this bug so it might be uplifted in 1.2.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Duplicate of bug: 821673
Flags: needinfo?(wchang)
blocking-b2g: hd? → ---
Severity: blocker → normal
(Reporter)

Comment 5

5 years ago
hi beatriz:
Can you accept the conclusion that this feature would not implemented on V1.1HD?
Thank you very much!
Flags: needinfo?(brg)
(In reply to lecky from comment #5)
> hi beatriz:
> Can you accept the conclusion that this feature would not implemented on
> V1.1HD?
> Thank you very much!
Yes, we agree with Mozilla(thanks Julien), please read comment 4.
We had improved this feature in v1.2.
Flags: needinfo?(brg)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.