Closed
Bug 907710
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Add UI to reverse sort order
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Query/Bug List, enhancement)
Bugzilla
Query/Bug List
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 6.0
People
(Reporter: jrmuizel, Assigned: dkl)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
1.59 KB,
patch
|
LpSolit
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
It would be nice if this was possible from the advance query ui
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Reverse sort order after sorting by what? Please elaborate.
Severity: normal → enhancement
Flags: needinfo?(jmuizelaar)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Sorry I meant to mention this in the summary. See bug 906913 for the use case.
Flags: needinfo?(jmuizelaar)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
We could just add "Bug Number Descending" to the sort drop down on the advanced query page.
dkl
Assignee: query-and-buglist → dkl
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Lawrence [:dkl] from comment #3)
> We could just add "Bug Number Descending" to the sort drop down on the
> advanced query page.
I see no reason to do it for bug IDs only. A checkbox "reverse order" besides the select field would work better, IMO.
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Frédéric Buclin from comment #4)
> I see no reason to do it for bug IDs only. A checkbox "reverse order"
> besides the select field would work better, IMO.
+1
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Following up on this bug. It would be a big time saver for security bug handlers, and I imagine for anyone who tracks a queue of bugs.
How expensive are searches for Bugzilla, could configuring saved descending sort options lessen the load?
I still have a bunch of queries I haven't updated with 'the hack' where each time I click the search link, I have to wait for the search to complete, then click sort by x to get it into the right order, A great percentage of my search queries are resorting, this is how most people use Bugzilla.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Adam Muntner [:adamm] (use NEEDINFO) from comment #6)
> Following up on this bug. It would be a big time saver for security bug
> handlers, and I imagine for anyone who tracks a queue of bugs.
>
> How expensive are searches for Bugzilla, could configuring saved descending
> sort options lessen the load?
>
> I still have a bunch of queries I haven't updated with 'the hack' where each
> time I click the search link, I have to wait for the search to complete,
> then click sort by x to get it into the right order, A great percentage of
> my search queries are resorting, this is how most people use Bugzilla.
BMO uses JS sorting code on the buglist.cgi page so it is not immediately obvious that you can manually sort the results and remember the URL with the new sort order.
If you add the following to your search URL, you can get the sorting you want:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?order=bug_id DESC
You can string multiple columns as well such as &order=bug_id DESC,bug_status,priority ASC,... and it will sort each one in order as if you had clicked on each column one at a time. The proper thing to do would be to make the JS code manipulate the order value in the URL so you can still bookmark it without doing it manually.
But we can definitely add the "Descending" checkbox on the advanced search page for the pre-set sort orders.
dkl
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8746730 -
Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8746730 [details] [diff] [review]
907710_1.patch
r=LpSolit
Attachment #8746730 -
Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review+
Updated•9 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 6.0
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
To ssh://gitolite3@git.mozilla.org/bugzilla/bugzilla.git
0748e84..2db8904 master -> master
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•