910929 - Assertion failure: pt && pt->associatedWith(zone->runtime_), at vm/Runtime.cpp

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)

Description

[Gary Kwong [:gkw] [:nth10sd] (NOT official MoCo now)]

Attachment: Stack

s = newGlobal()
function f(code) {
    try {
        evalcx(code, s)
    } catch (e) {}
}
f("\
    Object.defineProperty(this,\"v0\",{\
        get:function(){\
            return p2.t()\
        }\
    });\
    Object.defineProperty(this,\"p2\",{\
        get:function(){\
            return ParallelArray([497],function(){})\
        }\
    });\
    Object(v0);\
");
f("v0;");
f("(1 instanceof this);")

asserts js 64-bit debug shell intermittently on Windows 7 on m-c changeset dc7b76fcf7e4 (which contains the fix - rev d825964ccab6 for bug 903028) with --ion-eager --ion-parallel-compile=on at Assertion failure: pt && pt->associatedWith(zone->runtime_), at vm/Runtime.cpp

Shu-yu, you fixed bug 903028, perhaps these are related? (Setting s-s because that bug is also s-s.

My configure flags are:
--host=x86_64-pc-mingw32 --target=x86_64-pc-mingw32 --enable-optimize --enable-debug --enable-profiling --enable-gczeal --enable-debug-symbols --enable-methodjit --enable-type-inference --disable-tests --enable-more-deterministic --enable-threadsafe <NSPR flags, e.g. --with-system-nspr>

Comment 1

[Gary Kwong [:gkw] [:nth10sd] (NOT official MoCo now)]

Likely a regression from ParallelArrays, setting status flags to be similar to bug 903028.

Comment 2

[Matt Wobensmith [:mwobensmith][:matt:]]

Pre-CritSmash triage, setting sec-high as per related bug.

Comment 3

[Jan de Mooij [:jandem]]

Gary does this still reproduce for you?

Comment 4

[Christian Holler (:decoder)]

JSBugMon: Cannot process bug: Unable to automatically reproduce, please track manually.

Comment 5

[Shu-yu Guo [:shu]]

I can't reproduce this. Could I be re-needinfo?d if it reproduces?

Comment 6

[Gary Kwong [:gkw] [:nth10sd] (NOT official MoCo now)]

(In reply to Shu-yu Guo [:shu] from comment #5)
> I can't reproduce this. Could I be re-needinfo?d if it reproduces?

Do you mind testing on the specified rev on Windows 7? I'd need to retest too, but I'll be at a conference for the next few days and I'm still digging through bugmail.

Comment 7

[Gary Kwong [:gkw] [:nth10sd] (NOT official MoCo now)]

I can't reproduce this with m-c rev 34f431863037 anymore, nor can I reproduce with original rev in comment 0. -> WFM