911614 - In some components, the "security problem" checkbox marks bugs mozilla-corporation-confidential.

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 856952

(bugzilla.mozilla.org :: Administration, task)

Description

[Kyle Huey (Exited; not receiving bugmail, old account, do not use)]

See screenshot.

Comment 1

[Kyle Huey (Exited; not receiving bugmail, old account, do not use)]

See bug 911610 for this in action.

Comment 2

[Reed Loden [:reed]]

Yep, as some components don't have a viable "security" group option that makes sense, and some bugs need to be protected, so moco-confidential is a logical choice. Is there a group for RelEng that would make sense that you know of? Otherwise, this seems like WFM.

Comment 3

[Kyle Huey (Exited; not receiving bugmail, old account, do not use)]

Is it possible to skip having a security option at all for certain things?  It doesn't make any sense for mozilla.org::Repository Account Requests, for instance.

Comment 4

[:glob ✱]

(In reply to Kyle Huey [:khuey] ([e-mail]) from comment #3)
> Is it possible to skip having a security option at all for certain things? 
> It doesn't make any sense for mozilla.org::Repository Account Requests, for
> instance.

no, that isn't possible.

we could make it possible, however it would be limited to a product level, which massively limits its usability.

Comment 5

[Daniel Veditz [:dveditz]]

AFAIK the default group can only be set per-product (bug 856952 requests finer grain control). The mozilla.org "product" is such a mish-mash of things it's hard to know what makes sense there as the default hidden group, but something had to be picked. For other Products, like Firefox and Legal, it's much more obvious what the default security/hidden group should be.

Comment 6

[Kyle Huey (Exited; not receiving bugmail, old account, do not use)]

So I guess this is either WONTFIX or a dupe of bug 856952.

Comment 7

[:glob ✱]

/me flips coin ..