Closed
Bug 911803
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Cleanup Windows builds and tests display a bit
Categories
(Tree Management Graveyard :: TBPL, defect)
Tree Management Graveyard
TBPL
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: RyanVM, Assigned: RyanVM)
References
Details
Attachments
(4 files, 4 obsolete files)
3.95 KB,
patch
|
emorley
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.96 KB,
patch
|
emorley
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
2.81 KB,
patch
|
RyanVM
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.87 KB,
patch
|
emorley
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Windows x64 builds are no more Windows 7 than the x86 builds are. Since there is no intention of testing x64 builds on anything other than the Server 2012 VMs, I propose combining them into one line.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
As a note, comm-central also does Windows x64 builds, but doesn't run tests on them.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
This has the added benefit of grouping all the 32bit builds together and putting the x64 builds below them instead of wedging them in between Win7 and Win8.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #798556 -
Attachment description: per the summary → Merge Windows x64 builds and tests into one line
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Summary: Merge Windows x64 builds and tests into one line → Cleanup Windows builds and tests display a bit
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
With some more regex cleanups
Attachment #798556 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #798556 -
Flags: review?(emorley)
Attachment #798560 -
Flags: review?(emorley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
And now for the more controversial one. I would argue that Win Server 2k3 has more in common with XP than 7 (NT 5 kernel and such). Therefore, let's display it on the line with the platform it's more akin to like we do for everything else.
This also includes some regex cleanups for job names that are long-gone.
Attachment #798561 -
Flags: review?(emorley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
And on an aside, how silly that the Win8 ix slaves still use WINNT 6.2 as the job name when all the others use the full Windows name.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Borrowing the idea from the type block below. Not really the right bug for this, but I didn't feel like putting it in bug 911248 at this point and another bug for it seemed silly.
Attachment #798565 -
Flags: review?(emorley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
BTW, I figure that while some of these changes will take some getting used to, we might as well make them at the same time as the ones from bug 911248 so that it only requires one departure from what we knew from before :)
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 798560 [details] [diff] [review]
Merge Windows x64 builds and tests into one line
Review of attachment 798560 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
'win8' and '-xp-' etc are required for the jetpack job names (they annoyingly have their own scheme).
Attachment #798560 -
Flags: review?(emorley) → review-
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #798565 -
Flags: review?(emorley) → review+
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 798561 [details] [diff] [review]
Put Windows 32bit builds on the WinXP line
Review of attachment 798561 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Diff is unclear since seems to be making some of the same changes as patch 1 - don't suppose you can rebase? :-)
Attachment #798561 -
Flags: review?(emorley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Argh, stupid Jetpack tree. Thanks for pointing that out.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Now with less Jetpack bustage.
Attachment #798560 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #798657 -
Flags: review?(emorley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #798561 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #798659 -
Flags: review?(emorley)
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
Unfortunately the diffs don't apply (just want to test quickly) - can you fix patch #2? :-)
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
Sorry, that's because I put the comment patch at the front. Put this in front and the other two should apply fine.
Attachment #798813 -
Flags: review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #798565 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #798657 -
Flags: review?(emorley) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #798659 -
Flags: review?(emorley) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
Thank you for all these + the other bug :-)
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
One more minor change. I personally found the various Windows regex conditions to be a bit hard to parse from version to version. This just re-arranges them so that as much as possible, the conditions are in the same order for each version.
Attachment #798844 -
Flags: review?(emorley)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #798844 -
Flags: review?(emorley) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 19•12 years ago
|
||
In production :-)
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Webtools → Tree Management
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Tree Management → Tree Management Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•