Closed Bug 920638 Opened 8 years ago Closed 8 years ago
.build symbols into Sphinx documentation
The docstrings in sandbox_symbols.py describing the symbols in the moz.build sandbox are restructured text. Now that we have Sphinx, we should find a way to integrate them into the Sphinx docs. FWIW, the reason there is a test to cover docstring formatting is to ensure the docstrings can be formatted consistently without breaking |mach mozbuild-reference| and other downstream consumers relying on them being valid restructured text.
This should mostly be a rubber stamp review. But, there are a few changes in python/mozbuild that warrant review. Essentially this patch does 3 things: 1) Adds an --api-docs mode to |mach build-docs| which will generate .rst API docs for Mozilla's in-tree Python packages 2) Adds newly generated .rst files to version control. 3) Integrates the mozbuild sandbox symbols into Sphinx #3 is the most complicated. I had to write a Sphinx extension to import the symbols. I could have introduced a manual step where we need to update an .rst file every time we update sandbox_symbols.py, but that's tedious and won't get done. The extension turned out to be rather trivial. There's lots of moving around code from the mozbuild-reference mach command module into a new mozbuild.sphinx module. I also adjusted the ReST in sandbox_symbols.py to be warning free. It renders oh so nicely now. There are a few dozen formatting errors for docstrings in the Python modules. I hope to one day see that number go down to 0. Should be a good first bug for somebody.
Attachment #813340 - Flags: review?(mshal)
Comment on attachment 813340 [details] [diff] [review] Integrate moz.build symbols and Python API docs into Sphinx > @CommandProvider >-class MozbuildFileCommands(object): >+class MozbuildFileCommands(MachCommandBase): > @Command('mozbuild-reference', category='build-dev', > description='View reference documentation on mozbuild files.') > @CommandArgument('symbol', default=None, nargs='*', > help='Symbol to view help on. If not specified, all will be shown.') > @CommandArgument('--name-only', '-n', default=False, action='store_true', > help='Print symbol names only.') > def reference(self, symbol, name_only=False): >+ # mozbuild.sphinx imports some Sphinx modules, so we need to be sure >+ # the optional Sphinx package is installed. >+ self._activate_virtualenv() >+ self.virtualenv_manager.install_pip_package('Sphinx==1.1.3') >+ >+ from mozbuild.sphinx import ( >+ format_module, >+ function_reference, >+ special_reference, >+ variable_reference, >+ ) >+ >+ import mozbuild.frontend.sandbox_symbols as m Is it good form to import as a single character name? We don't seem to do that anywhere else. Also, what is the rationale for checking in files that are generated automatically? In general I don't like it since it makes it confusing what is actually edit-able by a developer, and what needs to be reviewed by a reviewer. But since it seems these files are already in the tree, I don't see this as a reason to block this patch.
Attachment #813340 - Flags: review?(mshal) → review+
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1190ae280cec I don't like auto-generated files in the tree either. But doing this right would require some code to aggregate static files with auto-generated files and I figured it was easier to ignore the problem for now. Followup bug.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla27
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.