Closed
Bug 924014
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Do not rely on std::numeric_limits<char16_t> being available
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla27
People
(Reporter: ehsan.akhgari, Assigned: ehsan.akhgari)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
17.22 KB,
patch
|
Waldo
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
Attachment #814018 -
Flags: review?(jwalden+bmo)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Case insensitive filesystems suck! This conflicts with <limits.h>. :(
Attachment #814018 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #814018 -
Flags: review?(jwalden+bmo)
Attachment #814019 -
Flags: review?(jwalden+bmo)
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 814019 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch (v2)
Review of attachment 814019 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: js/src/ctypes/CTypes.cpp
@@ +1377,5 @@
> JS_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(long long) == 8);
> JS_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(uintptr_t));
> JS_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(float) == 4);
> JS_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(PRFuncPtr) == sizeof(void*));
> +JS_STATIC_ASSERT(NumericLimits<double>::is_signed);
If NumericLimits is only needed in code that may allow char16_t, why do you need NumericLimits<double> here?
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> Comment on attachment 814019 [details] [diff] [review]
> --> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=814019
> Patch (v2)
>
> Review of attachment 814019 [details] [diff] [review]:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ::: js/src/ctypes/CTypes.cpp
> @@ +1377,5 @@
> > JS_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(long long) == 8);
> > JS_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(uintptr_t));
> > JS_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(float) == 4);
> > JS_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(PRFuncPtr) == sizeof(void*));
> > +JS_STATIC_ASSERT(NumericLimits<double>::is_signed);
>
> If NumericLimits is only needed in code that may allow char16_t, why do you
> need NumericLimits<double> here?
For consistency in this file.
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 814019 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch (v2)
Review of attachment 814019 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: mfbt/NumericLimits.h
@@ +19,5 @@
> +/**
> + * The NumericLimits class provides a compatibility layer with std::numeric_limits
> + * for char16_t, otherwise it is exactly the same as std::numeric_limits.
> + * Code which does not need std::numeric_limits<char16_t> should avoid using
> + * NumericLimits.
I'm not sure I agree with this bit, exactly, but meh.
@@ +21,5 @@
> + * for char16_t, otherwise it is exactly the same as std::numeric_limits.
> + * Code which does not need std::numeric_limits<char16_t> should avoid using
> + * NumericLimits.
> + */
> +template<class T>
typename T, since this won't always be a class (stylistic nit, I know they're equally functional here :-) ).
Attachment #814019 -
Flags: review?(jwalden+bmo) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla27
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•