Closed
Bug 927711
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
B2G MMS : Handle message delivered timestamp for delivery report
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: RIL, defect)
Tracking
(blocking-b2g:1.3+, firefox28 fixed)
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox28 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: airpingu, Assigned: airpingu)
References
Details
(Keywords: dev-doc-needed)
Attachments
(2 files, 2 obsolete files)
|
12.20 KB,
patch
|
ctai
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
1.26 KB,
patch
|
airpingu
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #887159 +++
Just like SMS, Gecko needs to expose delivered timestamp for MMS delivery report.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: koi? → 1.3?
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Set milestone. If it isn't reasonable for you, please directly change it.
Target Milestone: --- → 1.3 Sprint 6 - 12/6
Updated•12 years ago
|
Target Milestone: 1.3 Sprint 6 - 12/6 → 1.3 Sprint 4 - 11/8
| Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Keywords: dev-doc-needed
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Hi Jonas,
Could you please take the superreview? This exactly follows our agreement with W3C at [1]. Should be for sure to go. Note that this patch depends on Bug 928821 which is under way landing.
[1] http://messaging.sysapps.org/#idl-def-MmsDeliveryInfo
Attachment #825229 -
Flags: superreview?(jonas)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #825230 -
Flags: review?(ctai)
Comment on attachment 825229 [details] [diff] [review]
Part 1, DOM API IDL, V1
I'll defer to Hsin-Yi. But this looks good to me.
Attachment #825229 -
Flags: superreview?(jonas) → review?(htsai)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #825229 -
Flags: review?(htsai) → superreview?(htsai)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 825229 [details] [diff] [review]
Part 1, DOM API IDL, V1
As we just talked, we should use review? to review APIs instead of using superreview?. :)
Attachment #825229 -
Flags: superreview?(htsai) → review?(htsai)
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 825230 [details] [diff] [review]
Part 2, implementation, V1
Review of attachment 825230 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Good job. Only a small defect.
::: dom/mobilemessage/src/gonk/MmsService.js
@@ +1412,5 @@
> + deliveryInfo: aDomMessage.deliveryInfo,
> + sender: aDomMessage.sender,
> + receivers: aDomMessage.receivers,
> + timestamp: aDomMessage.timestamp,
> + deliveryTimestamp: aDomMessage.deliveryTimestamp,
We don't need this line. Because this information should be contained in deliveryInfo.
::: dom/mobilemessage/src/gonk/MobileMessageDatabaseService.js
@@ +1371,1 @@
> if (!match) {
We might need to use |matchPhoneNumbers| to match number. Or we should open a new bug for it.
Attachment #825230 -
Flags: review?(ctai)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Chia-hung Tai [:ctai :ctai_mozilla :cht] from comment #7)
> We might need to use |matchPhoneNumbers| to match number. Or we should open
> a new bug for it.
Thanks for the review! I'd prefer opening a new bug for that. Supposing we would want to back out this patch due to the wrong |matchPhoneNumbers|, then we don't need to back out this one which addresses separate issues.
Will come up with the new patch later. Thanks!
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #825230 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #827315 -
Flags: review?(ctai)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Gene Lian [:gene] (needinfo? encouraged) from comment #8)
> (In reply to Chia-hung Tai [:ctai :ctai_mozilla :cht] from comment #7)
> > We might need to use |matchPhoneNumbers| to match number. Or we should open
> > a new bug for it.
>
> Thanks for the review! I'd prefer opening a new bug for that. Supposing we
> would want to back out this patch due to the wrong |matchPhoneNumbers|, then
> we don't need to back out this one which addresses separate issues.
Open Bug 934931.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #827315 -
Flags: review?(ctai) → review+
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 825229 [details] [diff] [review]
Part 1, DOM API IDL, V1
Review of attachment 825229 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Looks good to me.
Attachment #825229 -
Flags: review?(htsai) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
r=hsinyi
Attachment #825229 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #827330 -
Flags: review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Gene Lian [:gene] (needinfo? encouraged) from comment #13)
> remote: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/b2g-inbound/rev/f27a2aba0db2
> remote: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/b2g-inbound/rev/6cb70cc44e8c
Hi Gene, sorry i had to backout this changesets since it caused build failures/bustages like https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=30132724&tree=B2g-Inbound
| Assignee | ||
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
So weird... I can pass my local build. Let's see try again: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=db00505e61cd
| Assignee | ||
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
The previous try is the wrong patch.
New try: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=f92b8c1f5be2
The result looks good (I didn't change anything). I don't why it would cause build failures. Maybe something wrong with the CLOBBER. Let's re-land this again.
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/b2g-inbound/rev/85ba50130edc
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/b2g-inbound/rev/9ac5edd968c0
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/85ba50130edc
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/9ac5edd968c0
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
status-firefox28:
--- → fixed
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•