Closed
Bug 929669
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Send a copy of production data to stage through PolyCrashStore
Categories
(Socorro :: Backend, task)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: selenamarie, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [config change])
Currently, we have a job that runs every 4 hours or so to copy Hbase data from prod to stage. I propose we change this so that we're sending data directly to stage from the crashmovers. I suggest we also change the retry functions to only try two or three times before timing out/totally failing. Goal is to get a reasonable amount of data into stage, rather than perfection.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
This change will require a configuration change for our crashmovers. I don't think we need a netflow, since we already are sending crashes with the submitter.
Whiteboard: [config change]
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Selena Deckelmann :selenamarie :selena from comment #2) > I suggest we also change the retry functions to only try two or three times > before timing out/totally failing. Goal is to get a reasonable amount of > data into stage, rather than perfection. Actually "perfection" is a requirement here - I have been asked many a times re crashes that exist in prod but not on stg --
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
is it a requirement that the crash_id match between production and stage?
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to K Lars Lohn [:lars] [:klohn] from comment #3) > is it a requirement that the crash_id match between production and stage? If you meant to refer to the HBase table key, *yes* --
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
:lars - was this for the code change, or did the config change happen?
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → 73
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
removing the tag - we cannot do this until we have all the hardware in place. Looking for the hardware bug to block this.
QA Contact: lars
Target Milestone: 73 → ---
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
we implemented this with aws lambda instead
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•