Closed
Bug 936121
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Add Hamachi support to Eideticker
Categories
(Testing Graveyard :: Eideticker, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: wlach, Assigned: wlach)
References
Details
(Keywords: perf, Whiteboard: [c=automation p= s=2013.12.06 u=])
Attachments
(1 file)
|
992 bytes,
patch
|
davehunt
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We want to be able to run eideticker against the Hamachi. This bug is meant to track any work needed to make this happen.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
William, are any changes needed in Eideticker to support a different device? Any luck working on this?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mandyam Vikram from comment #1)
> William, are any changes needed in Eideticker to support a different device?
> Any luck working on this?
Yes, we need to add support to Orangutan (the input simulator) for the Hamachi. Ordinarily this wouldn't be that difficult, but it looks like this particular device has some peculiarities. I've been sidetracked on another high priority project but I hope to have a look at this Thursday or Friday.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Trivial patch to add necessary bit to eideticker harness to support hamachi.
Attachment #8336397 -
Flags: review?(dave.hunt)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
So with the patch here and in bug 936120, the Hamachi is now working with Eideticker. Just need to get sign off from davehunt on my patches and we're good to go.
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8336397 [details] [diff] [review]
0001-Bug-936121-Eideticker-support-for-hamachi-r-davehunt.patch
Looks good.
Attachment #8336397 -
Flags: review?(dave.hunt) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [c=automation p= s= u=] → [c=automation p= s=2013.12.06 u=]
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
That's great.
Can we make another run using a build for which numbers have been published to re-calibrate our results?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mandyam Vikram from comment #7)
> That's great.
> Can we make another run using a build for which numbers have been published
> to re-calibrate our results?
Yes. I would like to wait until Dave resolves bug 937730 (and its dependencies) so we have a consistent set of results to work from.
Updated•8 years ago
|
Product: Testing → Testing Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•