937757 - image size affected when fetched via the command line

Status: UNCONFIRMED

(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)

Description

[Dan Jacobson]

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 Iceweasel/26.0a2 (Beta/Release)
Build ID: 20131020004007

Steps to reproduce:

Browsed http://graph.facebook.com/jidanni/picture?width=80&height=80


Actual results:

Got an image with a size (as seen in its URL too) different than 80x80.


Expected results:

URL with /s80x80/ with 80x80 image, as seen in other browsers.

Comment 1

[Paul Silaghi, QA [:pauly]]

Works fine to me on FF 26b5 and nightly 28.0a1 (2013-11-17).
Please check if the issue occurs using Firefox in safe mode (with your addons disabled):
http://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode

Or on a new, empty profile:
http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Managing-profiles#w_starting-the-profile-manager

Comment 2

[Dan Jacobson]

Further tests show that this occurs when using the command line.

# set ' http://graph.facebook.com/jidanni/picture?width=80&height=80'
# su - nobody -c 'HOME=/tmp firefox '"$@" #super pristine environment

Compare from command line
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-ash2/s86x86/379970_544950468861620_826405226_s.jpg VS.
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-ash2/c9.9.112.112/s80x80/379970_544950468861620_826405226_s.jpg
from URL bar, where everything is OK.

Also Google Chrome shows same problem.

(And no, the "&" didn't get snapped off due to Linux shell, as that would have given a different picture still,)

Comment 3

[Dan Jacobson]

One would expect
$ set 'http://graph.facebook.com/jidanni/picture?width=80&height=80'
$ HEAD -PSU $@
HEAD http://graph.facebook.com/jidanni/picture?width=80&height=80
User-Agent: lwp-request/6.03 libwww-perl/6.05

302 forced.302
HEAD http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-ash2/c9.9.112.112/s80x80/379970_544950468861620_826405226_s.jpg
User-Agent: lwp-request/6.03 libwww-perl/6.05

200 OK
Cache-Control: max-age=1209600
Connection: close
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:00:21 GMT
Content-Length: 2659
Content-Type: image/jpeg
Last-Modified: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:10:57 GMT
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
Client-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:00:21 GMT
Client-Peer: 72.246.189.242:80
Client-Response-Num: 1

Comment 4

[Dan Jacobson]

So why with the command line does one end up with 86x86?