93834 - Common source comments spelling mistake - deprecated, not depricated

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 106386

Description

[Neil Conway]

There is a common spelling mistake in the Mozilla source -- 'depricated' is used
instead of 'deprecated'.

Comment 1

[Neil Conway]

Created attachment 44757 [details] [diff] [review]
patch to fix spelling mistake

Comment 2

[Alexey Chernyak]

confirming.

Does this patch fix all occurences? If it does - then people might bother to
give it a quick review.

Also, it's convention to attach "diff -u" output, 
which is a bit easier for humans to read.

Comment 3

[Neil Conway]

Created attachment 44804 [details] [diff] [review]
unified patch to fix all instances of mistake

Comment 4

[Neil Conway]

I attached a new patch in unified diff format.

Yes, this patch does fix all the instances of the bug in the current CVS sources
(I searched using `grep`).

Thanks for the suggestions.

Comment 5

[Asa Dotzler [:asa]]

scott, I thought you'd like this one. 

Comment 6

[timeless]

Careless greps yield 11 files (14 changes) in patch.
perhaps 22 (32 occurrences) in the mozilla tree?

warnings: security/nss is locked, js might have special rules.

general thought: when this is checked in, should we post to npm.<somethings> 
reminding people to correctly spell this word?

I wonder if we should teach lxr about deprecated :-)

I'd give an r= but i think i'll wait for other comments...

Comment 7

[Neil Conway]

WRT: additional files: Woops, I must have missed some (does 'make -f client
checkout' not checkout the entire tree?). I'll check that and upload a new patch
when I get a chance (or else someone else can, it's not exactly rocket science
;-) ).

Yeah, posting to n.p.m.? would probably be a good idea but I dunno which group
would be the best.

Thanks for the feedback.

Comment 8

[timeless]

I sent the following to the reporter a whlie ago, i'm reproducing it here 
because someone asked me to address this bug. unfortunately, i'm typing 
blindly, so i'm not going to make any edits, just paste:

[e-mail] wrote:
> WRT: additional files: Woops, I must have missed some
you might have, or they might not have been there...
> does 'make -f client checkout' not checkout the entire tree?
it does not.  some parts of the tree (eg webtools) aren't necessary to mozilla 
browser development.
> I'll check that and upload a new patch when I get a chance
> (or else someone else can, it's not exactly rocket science ;-) ).
but it's so much fun

> Yeah, posting to n.p.m.? would probably be a good idea
> but I dunno which group would be the best.
hopefully someone will have ideas.

> Thanks for the feedback.
:-)

Comment 9

[Eli Friedman]

I just tried searching for depricated using LXR.  There are a zillion occurences
of MWJavaDoc_Proj_Depricated in macbuild xml files.  Is it possible to do a
global replace in Mozilla source replacing depricated with deprecated (since
there are _so_ many occurences?

Comment 10

[Glenn Randers-Pehrson]

Merged with bug #106386