Open
Bug 955351
Opened 11 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
a:visited is ignored, visited links stay the unvisited color
Categories
(Chat Core :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: bugzilla, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
1.12 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
*** Original post on bio 1914 by Billy <spanktastic2120 AT hotmail.com> at 2013-04-01 06:24:00 UTC *** version 1.4a1pre (20130331041723) I have added a:visited colors to both userchrome.css and the main.css of the message style im using. Visited links remain the unvisited color. In DOM Inspector it shows clicked links as having :link rules applied, so i think they are not being marked as visited after clicking. Here is the specific code i added. /* link coloring */ a:link {color:#7F7F7F !important;} a:visited {color:#000000 !important;} a:hover {color:#000000 !important;} a:active {color:#000000 !important;} The :link, :hover, and :active colors are all used properly, just not visited. I tested it in safe-mode and it exhibited the same behavior, but that would depend heavily on whether or not the default configuration has anything specified for a:visited. It does this in AIM and Yahoo, i cannot attest to other protocols because i dont use other ones.
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
*** Original post on bio 1914 as attmnt 2318 at 2013-04-03 11:27:00 UTC *** I haven't tested this, but clokep said on IRC that it works.
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
*** Original post on bio 1914 at 2013-04-03 11:48:59 UTC *** I briefly tested this and it seemed to work, I didn't check if it stayed between sessions, etc. Confirming this bug.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows 7 → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
*** Original post on bio 1914 by spanktastic2120 AT hotmail.com at 2013-04-15 01:16:16 UTC *** Im not familiar with how this works, when does the patch get added to the nightly?
OS: All → Windows 7
Hardware: All → x86
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
*** Original post on bio 1914 at 2013-04-15 01:23:54 UTC *** (In reply to comment #3) > Im not familiar with how this works, when does the patch get added to the > nightly? It first has to be reviewed, this has not passed review yet. We have a few questions about this that would need to be solved: - What are the privacy implications? Currently we don't keep any history so we don't need to give users a way to clear the history. If we kept history for only the current session we wouldn't necessarily need to care about this. - How would this affect Thunderbird? Thunderbird does not currently keep history at all. Once the patch passes review (you'd get emails for that) then the patch will be checked-in for the next nightly and we'll post a link to hg.instantbird.org that shows the changeset and mark the bug as "RESOLVED FIXED". Hopefully we can get a chance to look at this soon!
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: minor → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•