Closed
Bug 962667
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Don't optimize quartz image surfaces if there is nothing to do
Categories
(Core :: Graphics, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla29
People
(Reporter: mwu, Assigned: mwu)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
|
951 bytes,
patch
|
jrmuizel
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We don't need to do anything on OSX if the image format doesn't change. The surface is always allocated by ourselves and the image code already has it wrapped in a gfxQuartzImageSurface.
Attachment #8363778 -
Flags: review?(jmuizelaar)
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Michael Wu [:mwu] from comment #0)
> Created attachment 8363778 [details] [diff] [review]
> Avoid unnecessary creation of a new gfxQuartzImageSurface
>
> We don't need to do anything on OSX if the image format doesn't change. The
> surface is always allocated by ourselves and the image code already has it
> wrapped in a gfxQuartzImageSurface.
OptimizeImage() is only called when mQuartzSurface is NULL which suggests that we don't still have the gfxQuartzImageSurface wrapper around. So I'm not sure how this patch helps.
Flags: needinfo?(mwu)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8363778 [details] [diff] [review]
Avoid unnecessary creation of a new gfxQuartzImageSurface
Clearing review while I try to understand the code a bit better.
Attachment #8363778 -
Flags: review?(jmuizelaar)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
This removes the code that reuses the quartz surface. This helps in cases where the image ends up being scaled. (I am assuming that scaling code is actually used. I haven't checked.) The image gets locked (via LockImageData) again when scaling, which forces a copy to a new gfxImageSurface.
Attachment #8363778 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8364638 -
Flags: review?(jmuizelaar)
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8364638 [details] [diff] [review]
Avoid using mOptSurface when no optimization is necessary
Review of attachment 8364638 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This seems ok. It might be worth splitting the two pieces up into separate patches.
Attachment #8364638 -
Flags: review?(jmuizelaar) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/977fb2494568
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/fc3d3be15c0c
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla29
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•