968054 - [DSDS] Out of coverage RSSI icons are different if the SIM card has data connection first.

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 975973

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::System, defect)

Description

[Enpei]

Attachment: DSDSdatacall.png

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #961927 +++

After bug 961927 is fixed, there is another bug found that if SIM 1 has data call connected first, then entering no service area, there will be a "O" icon overlaps on "1". Same as SIM 2. But if there is no data call established first, "O" will not be seen.

I don't think it's necessary to have this difference and there is no benefit doing so. But if anyone has concern, please ni? UX to judge that.

* Build Number  
Gaia      bb36b4164d3e51ca04b612e507e1178f80bf240d
Gecko     4227240a4d3e1e418ced160c2a48cb454d7b5645
BuildID   20140204104742
Version   28.0

* Reproduce Steps
1. Enabled data call on either SIM 1 or SIM 2.
2. Enter no network area, watch the RSSI of both SIM.

* Expected Result
Both RSSI has "x" on the signal bar.

* Actual Result
The SIM has data call will also have "O" overlaps its SIM card number.

* Occurrence rate
100%

Comment 1

[Arthur Chen [:arthurcc][inactive after 6/30]]

Enpei, the icon stands for the type of the current data call. "0" means that the current type is unknown, which is slightly different from no signal or not connected.

Edgar, is it possible that data.connected is true, data.type is null, but voice.connected is false?

If data.type and voice.connected are note related to each other, I would suggest to keep the "0" icon.

Comment 2

[Enpei]

(In reply to Arthur Chen [:arthurcc] (OOO 1/30 ~ 2/4) from comment #1)
> Enpei, the icon stands for the type of the current data call. "0" means that
> the current type is unknown, which is slightly different from no signal or
> not connected.

Understood. But it's on top of SIM number which is not pretty at all. So that's why I would say we need UX comment if needed.

Comment 3

[Arthur Chen [:arthurcc][inactive after 6/30]]

Yap, at least we should fix the overlapping.

Comment 4

[Edgar Chen [:edgar]]

(In reply to Arthur Chen [:arthurcc] (OOO 1/30 ~ 2/4) from comment #1)
> 
> Edgar, is it possible that data.connected is true, data.type is null, but
> voice.connected is false?
voice and data may have different status.
And data.connected is referencing to the data connection is existed or not.
In this case, it seems modem still reports data connection is existed, so data.connected is 'true'.
I check the unagi, it has same behavior.
Thank you.

> 
> If data.type and voice.connected are note related to each other, I would
> suggest to keep the "0" icon.

Comment 5

[Arthur Chen [:arthurcc][inactive after 6/30]]

Thanks for the explanation, Edgar. 

Fang, following the same logic (as 4G, 3G... etc) it seems we should shrink the "0" icon and place it on top of the SIM number, right?

Comment 6

[Arthur Chen [:arthurcc][inactive after 6/30]]

Attachment: SIM Statusbar_2.png

The current visual was not implemented based on the UI spec.

The "0" icon and the data type should remain the same size but the SIM number should be place on top of the signal bar.

Comment 7

[Arthur Chen [:arthurcc][inactive after 6/30]]

Attachment: SIM Statusbar UI spec

Comment 8

[Fang Shih [:fang]]

(In reply to Arthur Chen [:arthurcc] from comment #5)
> Thanks for the explanation, Edgar. 
> 
> Fang, following the same logic (as 4G, 3G... etc) it seems we should shrink
> the "0" icon and place it on top of the SIM number, right?

Hi Arthur,
The "0" icon should be placed the same position as 4G,3G... Etc
No need to shrink the icon.