Closed Bug 974806 Opened 12 years ago Closed 8 years ago

[Sora][Call][MPTY] User can not split a call from Multiparty call.

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Dialer, defect, P1)

defect

Tracking

(tracking-b2g:backlog)

RESOLVED WONTFIX
tracking-b2g backlog

People

(Reporter: sync-1, Unassigned)

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

Created an attachment (id=641567) Screenshots for this PR DEFECT DESCRIPTION: User can not choose a call from conference call to communicate. REPRODUCING PROCEDURES: 1. Idle -> Establish a call -> Tap "Add call" icon -> Add a call from Dialer or contacts -> Build a conference call -> Tap ">" icon -> Enter the detail of the conference call -> Can not choose a call from the conference call, only can hang up a call -> KO EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR: User can choose a call from conference call to communicate. ASSOCIATE SPECIFICATION: TEST PLAN REFERENCE: TOOLS AND PLATFORMS USED: USER IMPACT: REPRODUCING RATE: 100% For FT PR, PleaseInsert list reference mobile's behavior:
Attached image Screenshots for this PR
Firefox OS v1.3 Mozilla build ID: 20140208004002
Hi, Does v1.3 support this feature?
Hi, Does v1.3 support this feature?
Flags: needinfo?(jsmith)
(In reply to Mingming ZHAO from comment #4) > Hi, Does v1.3 support this feature? Rik I think would know.
Flags: needinfo?(jsmith)
blocking-b2g: --- → 1.3?
needinfo for comment 5
Flags: needinfo?(anthony)
comms triage: new feature so adding it to backlog, ni to Carrie to know UX input here. Thanks!
blocking-b2g: 1.3? → backlog
Flags: needinfo?(cawang)
Flags: needinfo?(anthony)
I think originally Francis did the spec for this feature. Please check p.16 of the attached spec.
Flags: needinfo?(cawang)
My SIM cards can't merge calls at the moment (operators block the function here in TW). ni? Anthony to confirm if the feature is implemented or not. Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(anthony)
As Noemi said in comment 7, this is a new feature request. We don't support extracting one call from a conference call. But I'm not sure we should support it either. Every new feature has a lot of costs (cost to implement and maintain, complexity for the user, etc). Do we really want to do this?
Flags: needinfo?(anthony) → needinfo?(wmathanaraj)
this sounds like an advanced feature of conference call feature - we can leave this open for people to contribute but not something we should spend time on working actively. its in backlog so we can leave it there for now.
Flags: needinfo?(wmathanaraj)
Dears, Please take this function in account, thanks.
blocking-b2g: backlog → 2.2?
This is new feature so maybe let's renominate to feature-b2g:2.2?
blocking-b2g: 2.2? → ---
feature-b2g: --- → 2.2?
Flags: needinfo?(wmathanaraj)
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: not in 2.2 must-have scope.
feature-b2g: 2.2? → ---
tracking-b2g: --- → ?
this can not happen in 2.2 - we discussed this few times and its a lot of work to land in 2.2
Flags: needinfo?(wmathanaraj)
link all Fire C (codename: Sora) bugs to a meta one.
Firefox OS is not being worked on
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: