Closed
Bug 97617
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
New windows should inherit toolbar visibility from current window
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: UI Design, defect)
SeaMonkey
UI Design
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: CatamountJack, Assigned: trudelle)
Details
Steps to reproduce: 1. Open two browser windows, A and B, with any page containing links in each. 2. Make sure the toolbars in A are expanded and collapse all the toolbars in window B. 3. Right click on any link in window B and open the link in a new window. 4. Now right click on a link in window A on a link and open it in a new window. Expected Results: Windows should inherit the state of the toolbars from which they were opened. The window opened from B should have toolbars collapsed. The window opened from A should have toolbars expanded. This is how Navigator 4.x worked. Actual Results: Both new opened windows have toolbars collapsed. Observations: It appears that the new window inherits not the state of the toolbars in the current window, but rather the last action taked regarding collapsing or expanding toolbars globally because following this pattern with multiple new windows has the same effect.
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Confirming, over to widgets
Assignee: asa → trudelle
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Browser-General → XP Toolkit/Widgets
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows 2000 → All
QA Contact: doronr → jrgm
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Found this also applies to the sidebar. I will try to file a new bug later today.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
I'm not sure I agree that the behavior you expect is best for all. Typical users might expect new windows to have default appearance (e.g., both subsequent windows have toolbars), or whatever appearance they last set, remembered by sticky pref (e.g., neither have toolbar). IMO, both of these policies are simpler, and yield more consistent and predictable behavior. I don't think there is any widely-held, valid user model in which windows are 'children' of whatever window happened to be active at the time they were created, and inherit properties from them. cc UE folks for input.
Whiteboard: Need UE input
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
resolving as invalid, current behavior is as expected.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
Reopening. The requested behavior is not only 4xp, it is also more predictable than either of Trudelle's alternatives: it is much more obvious what the state of the current window is than either (a) what the app's default is or (b) what the setting was in whichever window you altered last (since you often won't remember which window you altered last, if that window is even still open).
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Component: XP Toolkit/Widgets → XP Apps: GUI Features
Keywords: 4xp
Hardware: PC → All
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
--> XP Apps: GUI
Assignee: trudelle → blakeross
Status: REOPENED → NEW
QA Contact: jrgm → sairuh
Whiteboard: Need UE input
Updated•23 years ago
|
QA Contact: sairuh → claudius
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
MPT: you have no right to reassign bugs you don't own, please leave mine alone. Taking back, and cc'ing UE for input once again. This may be 4xp, but that doesn't make 4.x right. Current trunk behavior matches 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.2.1 and IE.
Assignee: blakeross → trudelle
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
Although the current behavior is a little unpredictable in a test case (having lots of browser windows open in different states), I believe that users collapse toolbars to enlarge viewing space. Putting the browser in this state is extremely useful on small screens, which defines the configuration of a large part of our audience. Therefore I think preserving the implemented behavior preserves the state most users have set their current browsers to. We shouldn't change user settings without having a tremendous usability win for doing so. That constitutes taking control from users which is a "bad idea" (see all platform principles). Also, this behavior (opening windows with last set toolbar state) is consistent with other window states we preserve based on last setting, e.g. window size. Having the behaviors consistent across different states makes the system more predictable (a "good thing", see platform principles).
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
->invalid
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago → 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•23 years ago
|
||
*sigh* Seeing as how I first filed this bug, I'd like to reopen it... I agree with MPT's comments - I find it much more predictable than the current implementation and while it matches 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.21, and IE, that doesn't make them right either. Mr. Trudelle, while you say there is no valid user model of such "child windows" I suggest that Nav4 (and previous version of Nav I believe) were as much of a model as you could find. Having been this way in previous versions of Navigator, there must have been a reason and I do believe it was a good one - I became very accustomed to this handling and I'm sure I'm not alone. This new way isn't working (for me). Granted new users might adapt more to the current implementation, (is there any valid user model for that either?) but what about the old users? When I open a new window and change the toolbar state, it's usually because I'm viewing an image or selection of text that is larger than the viewing area with the toolbar's expanded. If I want any new windows opened (usually from links anyway), I can SEE what the state of the new window will be. As it is now, I have to remember what state I had them in 1, 2, 5, or 20 minutes ago. I don't recall *ever* having collapsed the toolbars and left them that way - that would really interfere with my browsing experience. Now that this has been changed from previous Navigator versions, I am constantly (compared to before) having to re-expand my toolbars. Is there to be no further discussion? How about a pref - at least let me, the user decide. I apolgize for being so verbose, but I take great issue with this... Thanks, Brett
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
Brett, people can discuss this all they want in n.p.m.ui or n.p.m.browser (and we have), but we have input from UE (Lori) that the implemented behavior is as intended, so this bug is invalid. If you'd prefer to call it an enhancement, I could resolve it as wontfix, but you get the idea. We are aiming this at millions of typical users, not at me or you. I see no reason for making this a pref; we don't want 'design by committee', where every decision is avoided by creating a new pref, which requires more complexity, more code, more bloat, etc.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago → 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Core → Mozilla Application Suite
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•