977591 - [zffos1.3][P3](Local) The DuT does not exchange a multiparty call with a voice call.

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Dialer, defect)

Description

[FangChen]

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; TCO_20140227092630; rv:11.0) like Gecko

Steps to reproduce:

    A.- Overview Description (technical background, concise explanation of the bug):
    The DuT does not exchange a multiparty call with a voice call.
    
    ________________________________________________________________________________
    B.- Steps to Reproduce (initial conditions, required resources, step by step instructions to reproduce):
    1- Establish an outgoing call to a phone number.
2- Using the menu add a new voice call.
3- Merge the calls in multiparty call.
4- Using the menu add a new voice call.
5- Place the new call on hold, and retrieve the multiparty call.
6- Now place the multiparty call on hold, and retrieve the other call.
    


Actual results:

The DuT does not exchange a multiparty call with a voice call. The DuT is blocked



Expected results:

The DuT must exchange correctly a multiparty call with a voice call

Comment 1

[FangChen]

Built ID :20140218180032
OS version
1.3.0.0-prerelease
QC RIL commit:
a406d321  Add null check when handling set preferred network type
QC RIL TAG version: AU_LINUX_GECKO_B2G_JB_3.2.01.03.00.112.223

gaia commit:
744fb691 Merge pull request #15526 from steveck-chung/bug-961231

gecko commit:
6840e8c2 Bumping gaia.json for 1 gaia-1_3 revision(s) a=gaia-bump

Comment 2

[isabelrios]

Please see bug 960507

It is not exactly the same as the reported one but it is also reproducible. In the past we dealt with several problems when managing a multi-party call and another call. Maybe that patch should be included.

Thanks

Comment 3

[Juan Perez-Bedmar [:juanpbf]]

(In reply to Isabel Rios [:isabel_rios] from comment #2)
> Please see bug 960507
> (...) Maybe that patch should be included.
> 
> Thanks

Please Chen Cong, take that patch into consideration and let's check it in a new build

Comment 4

[Doug Sherk (:drs) (inactive)]

We can't repro this anymore.