Closed Bug 977630 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

[Single Variant] Builds Generation with Single Variant is not working

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::System, defect)

Other
Other
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED

People

(Reporter: rafael.marquez, Assigned: yurenju)

Details

(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [systemsfe])

Attachments

(1 file)

*Procedire 1. Installing a master build on device 2. Clone the tests repository for sigle variant: https://github.com/telefonicaid/firefoxos-gaia-testsbuild.git 3. Configuring the file variant.json with a params similar to: "id": "movistar", "mcc-mnc": [ "214-001", "214-002", "214-005", "214-007" ], 4. Clone Gaia repository and select the master branch. 5. Executing the command "GAIA_DISTRIBUTION_DIR="URL"/firefoxos-gaia-testsbuild PRODUCTION=1 make reset-gaia" to install gaia with single variant in the device 6.Complete FTE with a movistar SIM with mnc/mcc 214/007 *Expected Result Configured apps are installed *Actual Result Configured apps are not installed. If we have several mnc/mcc for a id, the configured apps are not installed
Assignee: nobody → acperez
Keywords: regression
Whiteboard: [systemsfe]
After single variant refactor seems that generated singlevariantconf.json has wrong format, now has the following content: {"214-001,214-002,214-005,214-007":["Calculator","Poppit","Wikipedia"],"734-004":["Twitter","Facebook","Accuweather","Wikipedia"]} And it should besomething like: "214-001":["Calculator","Poppit","Wikipedia"], "214-002":["Calculator","Poppit","Wikipedia"], "214-005":["Calculator","Poppit","Wikipedia"], "214-007":["Calculator","Poppit","Wikipedia"], "734-004":["Twitter","Facebook","Accuweather","Wikipedia"] It makes mcc/mnc not being matched with "214-001,214-002,214-005,214-007", so applications are not installed.
Yuren, can you confirm if the behavior commented on comment 1 is planned as a new way to do it or it is a bug?
Flags: needinfo?(yurenju.mozilla)
(In reply to Albert [:albert] from comment #2) > Yuren, can you confirm if the behavior commented on comment 1 is planned as > a new way to do it or it is a bug? We really shouldn't be switching these things around this much. We're going to run into unnecessary operator communication overhead if we keep changing the format.
blocking-b2g: --- → 1.4?
No, that's a bug. I'll fix it and add test case for it.
Assignee: acperez → yurenju.mozilla
Flags: needinfo?(yurenju.mozilla)
Flags: in-testsuite+
Attachment #8384412 - Flags: review?(acperez) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
blocking-b2g: 1.4? → ---
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: