Closed Bug 983466 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

let's stand up 2 more Bedrock nodes in PHX1

Categories

(Infrastructure & Operations :: Virtualization, task)

x86
macOS
task
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: nmaul, Assigned: cknowles)

Details

Hi all, It seems like we've got enough power to host things under optimal (no failures) conditions, but I don't think we have enough to handle the load in PHX1 should SCL3 fail. I'm also a little twitchy about the load we have on 2 of the 3 nodes in PHX1, if one of them fails. If we bump this up to 5 nodes, we'll have approximately equal per-node loading on all nodes across SCL3 and PHX1, which seems like a good thing in itself (although the VMs are less powerful, at least they'll be doing the same amount of work). This seems like it would be a better overall scenario as compared to allocating more cores and more RAM to the existing nodes. However if anyone disagrees, we could go that route instead. bedrock4.webapp.phx1 bedrock5.webapp.phx1 2 cores, 8GB RAM, 40GB disk should be fine Thanks!
Alright, I've got this, and will have them for you tomorrow. CJK
Assignee: server-ops-virtualization → cknowles
Alright, those are spun up - ticket 983644 has been filed for netflows. (mod if you need to) puppet/nagios initial work has been done, ready for your customization. CJK
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Will someone please add me to the cc list for https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=983664 so that I can track the progress?
Product: mozilla.org → Infrastructure & Operations
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.