Closed
Bug 983466
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
let's stand up 2 more Bedrock nodes in PHX1
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations :: Virtualization, task)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: nmaul, Assigned: cknowles)
Details
Hi all,
It seems like we've got enough power to host things under optimal (no failures) conditions, but I don't think we have enough to handle the load in PHX1 should SCL3 fail. I'm also a little twitchy about the load we have on 2 of the 3 nodes in PHX1, if one of them fails.
If we bump this up to 5 nodes, we'll have approximately equal per-node loading on all nodes across SCL3 and PHX1, which seems like a good thing in itself (although the VMs are less powerful, at least they'll be doing the same amount of work).
This seems like it would be a better overall scenario as compared to allocating more cores and more RAM to the existing nodes. However if anyone disagrees, we could go that route instead.
bedrock4.webapp.phx1
bedrock5.webapp.phx1
2 cores, 8GB RAM, 40GB disk should be fine
Thanks!
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Alright, I've got this, and will have them for you tomorrow.
CJK
Assignee: server-ops-virtualization → cknowles
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Alright, those are spun up - ticket 983644 has been filed for netflows. (mod if you need to)
puppet/nagios initial work has been done, ready for your customization.
CJK
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Will someone please add me to the cc list for https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=983664 so that I can track the progress?
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Infrastructure & Operations
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•