I have not investigated this thouroughly, but file a bug because for a while we will not build the tip. Windows 2000 (nssqa-win2k) passed debug and failed OPt only, sonjaNT failed both Failures look the same on both systems, failures on 95 and NT build looked the same or at least very similar ssl.sh: SSL tests =============================== ssl.sh: SSL Cipher Coverage =============================== selfserv -p 8443 -d ../server -n nssqa-win2k.red.iplanet.com \ -w nss -c ABCDEFabcdefghijklm -i ../tests_pid.1388 & selfserv started at Fri Sep 14 04:25:30 PDT 2001 tstclnt -p 8443 -h nssqa-win2k -q -d . < W:/nss/nss322/builds/20010820.1/blowfish_NT4.0_Win95/mozilla/security/nss/tests/ssl/sslreq.txt  + Done(139) ? 1100 Segmentation violation tstclnt RETRY: tstclnt -p 8443 -h nssqa-win2k -q -d . < W:/nss/nss322/builds/20010820.1/blowfish_NT4.0_Win95/mozilla/security/nss/tests/ssl/sslreq.txt  + Done(139) ? 1376 Segmentation violation tstclnt smime.sh: S/MIME Tests =============================== smime.sh: Signing Attached Message ------------------------------ cmsutil -S -N Alice -i alice.txt -d ../alicedir -p nss -o alice.sig  + Done(139) ? 410 Segmentation violation cmsutil smime.sh: Create Signature Alice . FAILED cmsutil -D -i alice.sig -d ../bobdir -o alice.data1  + Done(139) ? 452 Segmentation violation cmsutil smime.sh: Decode Alice's Signature . FAILED diff alice.txt alice.data1 1,6d0 < Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 00:00:01 -0700 (PDT) < From: firstname.lastname@example.org < Subject: message Alice --> Bob < To: email@example.com < < This is a test message from Alice to Bob. smime.sh: Compare Decoded Signature and Original . FAILED
I'm presuming the subject should read: Old 'tstclnt' and 'cmsutil' seg violation on new library. The opposite is not necessarily expected to work. bob
yes, you are right - but since that is the only combination we test in the backward compatibility tests I did not specify this explicitly I also noticed that the attachments I put on this bug were wrong, these are the passed main tests and not the backward compatibility tests, I'll attach the rigt ones now... the Path we were using in the failed tests was w:/nss/nss322/builds/20010820.1/blowfish_NT4.0_Win95/mozilla/dist/WINNT4.0_DBG.OBJ/bin; w:/nss/nsstip/builds/20010914.1/blowfish_NT4.0_Win95/mozilla/dist/WINNT4.0_DBG.OBJ/lib
Assigned the bug to Ian.
Assignee: wtc → ian.mcgreer
Priority: -- → P1
Target Milestone: --- → 3.4
Should I leave the backward compatibility test on now after all? I do not know if you were still in the meeting Ian when we decided to turn of the backward compatibility tests because Bob R. will not fix the other issues ( bug #104061 ) any time soon
This problem has not been seen in a while
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.