Closed
Bug 102905
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Site navigation (links) toolbar doesn't update when tabs are switched
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Tabbed Browser, defect)
SeaMonkey
Tabbed Browser
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: ian, Assigned: drbrain-bugzilla)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: polish, Whiteboard: [Hixie-P0])
Attachments
(1 file, 3 obsolete files)
1.46 KB,
patch
|
sballard
:
review+
bzbarsky
:
superreview+
blizzard
:
approval+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
Open the link toolbar (View | Show/Hide | Link Toolbar).
Go to a web page with links, e.g.:
http://www.bath.ac.uk/~py8ieh/internet/eviltests/link2.html
Open a new tab (Ctrl+T).
Go to a web page with different or no links (e.g. http://www.w3.org/).
Switch to the other tab.
ACTUAL RESULTS
The link toolbar doesn't switch with the tabbed browser stuff.
cc'ing usual suspects as per bug 102832 + hyatt.
I'm seeing this problem on 2001100303 in Windows 98SE, switching back and forth
between this bug and the Mozilla start page. Reloading the tab fixes the links.
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Please have a look at bug 102990. I posted an idea there that is closely related
to this.
![]() |
||
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 103007 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
The link toolbar can use the DOM to add a "select" event listener to the
tabbrowser. It will then be notified whenever the tabs are switched. This
listener should check the target of the event to make sure it's a tab, though,
since select also fires for the deck section of the tabbrowser as well.
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
Interesting comment by hyatt there - internally the tabbrowser looks for the
select event on the deck section rather than the tabs...
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
Yeah, you could do that too. Listen for either one.
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 103486 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 103901 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
updating summary for new toolbar name
Summary: Link toolbar doesn't update when tabs are switched → Site navigation toolbar doesn't update when tabs are switched
Comment 10•23 years ago
|
||
Don't know how I missed getting cc'd to this one :)
I can probably put together a fix for this but it would actually be a wonderful
bug for anybody with win or linux, a nightly build, and patch maker to try out
their hacking skills on :) All you need to do is modify the initHandlers
function in content/navigator/linkToolbarOverlay.js to add a handler to the
"select" event (as described by Hyatt) that does the same thing as "load".
I might be able to have a go at this tonight if nobody else gets to it first,
but I really can't think of a better bug for someone who's wanting to make their
first steps into mozilla hacking, especially if you are a user of tabs who's
hurt by this bug. Anybody out there fit that profile?
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
Who am I to resist such a challenge? Grabbing the tarball now.
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
All right. The patch I just submitted seems to be doing what Stuart
suggested--adding a event listener for the "select" event--but it definitely
doesn't work. I'm not entirely sure why, but since this is my first attempt at
messing with Moz's JS, that's no great surprise.
Any ideas? Am I going about it entirely the wrong way?
Comment 14•23 years ago
|
||
I don't think the content area actually gets the select event. I think you need
to add the event listener to the tabbrowser container. Look in tabbrowser.xml
for a clue about how the <tabbrowser> event stuff is working.
http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpfe/global/resources/content/bindings/tabbrowser.xml
Comment 15•23 years ago
|
||
Meep. I'd be lying if I said that I understood much of what's going on in
tabbrowser.xml, much less why the content area isn't getting the "select" event
upon the listener receiving it.
Looking at that XML file, I see a lot of work with the progress listener--I'd
assume that's for the nifty little rotating arrow animation that appears
whenever the page is loading--and some hooks for a title listener, which
activates when the title changes and is (sensibly) only kicked off once you
actually open a second tab. I'm not sure how to go about adding a listener for
the SNToolbar there, if it's necessary.
![]() |
||
Comment 16•23 years ago
|
||
OK, a few problems here:
1) the select event is fired on the tabbrowser's tabbox. Search for 'select'
in tabbrowser.xml to see where the handler is set up.
2) the "refresh" method does:
if (event.originalTarget != getBrowser().contentDocument)
return;
This will need to be changed slightly to handle the onselect being fired,
since that's _not_ fired on the contentDocument.
Comment 17•23 years ago
|
||
Methinks this is beyond my tiny Moz-hacking skills. Someone else feel free to
give it a whack.
Comment 18•23 years ago
|
||
Hm. I've just tried a slightly modified version of this, and it seems that the
"select" event gets fired *before* the document is actually updated. Thus
selecting a tab causes the toolbar to act as it should have acted for whichever
tab was *previously* selected, rather than for the newly selected tab. Is there
a "correct" way to avoid being called until after the select operation is
complete, or will I just need to use setTimeout()?
Also, I removed the target check completely on the tab-selection, because I
couldn't figure out what to check for. Any tips?
I'll attach my work-in-progress patch below.
Comment 19•23 years ago
|
||
Comment 20•23 years ago
|
||
Btw, Phil, sorry for underestimating the complexity of this. I forgot about the
"originalTarget" check, and I didn't realize that the event was firing somewhere
different than the others.
![]() |
||
Comment 21•23 years ago
|
||
Maybe I'm missing something... but would it not make sense to hook into the
updateCurrentBrowser() method in tabbrowser.xml? That's _already_ listening to
the right event and doing target checking and all that.
Stuart, with that patch is your event getting triggered before or after
updateCurrentBrowser() is called?
Comment 22•23 years ago
|
||
Putting the code into updateCurrentBrowser would break the self-containedness of
the linkToolbar, although I can see doing that if it makes sense.
Also (pragmatic reason) PatchMaker is telling me I can't edit tabbrowser.xml
because it can't find the original source, so I can't easily produce patches for
it (I might be able to hack chromelist.txt to avoid this problem, though).
It appears that selectTab is called (twice, no less) *before*
updateCurrentBrowser gets called at all. Does that help? :)
Comment 23•23 years ago
|
||
No problem. When you've never submitted a patch, you can't do any worse than a
non-working one. At least I tried. ;)
Comment 24•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 106368 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 25•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 104671 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26•23 years ago
|
||
The fact that the select fires *before* the tab has finished being selected is a
bug. The problem is this: The tabs element fires the select before switching the
tabpanels display. This means the tabbrowser element has to catch the select on
the tabpanels rather than the tabs element. However this doesn't work when
deleting the first tab, and the tabbrowser element has a hack to work around
this. If the patch to 106656 is checked in then the tabs element will fire the
select late enough for the tabbrowser to be able to catch it instead of the
current hack. Once this is done you will be able to catch it after the tab has
switched. Questions?
Depends on: 106656
Comment 27•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 108278 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 28•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 110511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 29•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 111620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30•23 years ago
|
||
throwing another keyword in the summary to make this easier to find.
I almost made a dup bug because I always thought of it as
the links toolbar instead of site navigation toolbar.
-matt
Summary: Site navigation toolbar doesn't update when tabs are switched → Site navigation (links) toolbar doesn't update when tabs are switched
Comment 31•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 114319 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 32•23 years ago
|
||
There is not assocation between a tab and the associated navigation bar (when
it's supposed to exist), so when I change from one tab A to tab B, the
navigation bar of tab A stay in place. Now I am reading tab B and if I click on
up in the navigation bar, the tab A page is loading in tab B! (Win NT 4 + Moz
build 2001122703).
Comment 33•23 years ago
|
||
I don't *like* this patch, but it does solve the problem. In an ideal world,
the linktoolbar would be self-contained and be able to rely on events being
fired to update itself. Unfortunately, the tabbrowser isn't firing the select
event at the right time, so that isn't possible right now (bug 106656
apparently).
Instead, this patch just gets the tabbrowser to update the linktoolbar
manually, if applicable. This makes tabs and the linktoolbar usable together,
almost.
Issues with this patch:
- It conflicts with the patch for bug 103097, which will hopefully be checked
in soon if I can get sr on it. I'll produce an updated patch when bug 103097 is
finalized.
- The toolbar pops in and out of existence as you switch between tabs that do
and don't have links. This is a pain in the neck. Bug 103428 tracks one
workaround to this; bug 102990 tracks another.
I believe that this patch is still sufficiently better than the current
situation that it might be worth checking in. If this beats bug 103097 into the
tree, then I'll update that patch to cover the necessary changes to this code,
too.
Either way this bug should be kept open until bug 106656 is fixed, so this can
be done in a more elegant way.
Attachment #52780 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #52904 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 34•23 years ago
|
||
I've produced a big patch containing these changes and bug 103097's patch and
attached it to bug 103428. If you want the ultimate tabs-and-links experience, I
suggest applying that patch :) It's not ready to checkin yet, mostly because
it's not available separately from the changes in bug 103097, but testing would
be appreciated. Users of binary nightly builds can apply the patch using
patch-maker.
Reporter | ||
Comment 35•23 years ago
|
||
Upping severity to major -- this is probably the worst Link Toolbar bug there
is. It regularly interferes with my using the link toolbar on a daily basis.
Severity: normal → major
Comment 36•23 years ago
|
||
The sidebar has the same problem. For instance, the DOM Inspector sidebar
pane is not updated when tabs are switched.
Comment 37•23 years ago
|
||
The patch in bug 103428 works for this problem - the only issue is that it
breaks the self-containedness of the linktoolbar by putting linktoolbar-specific
code in the tabbrowser. I'll work on figuring out a way to do this with events
that will avoid that problem.
This and bug 103428 are legitimately separate problems, but I'm working on the
two together and patches will probably keep appearing there rather than here.
Comment 38•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 119395 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 39•23 years ago
|
||
Does the proposed fix for this bug include the case when both the tabs have
<link> tags ? In this case, switching between tabs and clicking on one of the
site-navigation links should load the correct document. If not, then I think
that closing bug 119395 as duplicate is not correct.
Comment 40•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 124115 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 41•23 years ago
|
||
I can confirm this bug in 2002022203/WinXP. The two sites are www.w3.org in
second tab and richinstyle.com in first tab.
Comment 42•23 years ago
|
||
Is there any chance of getting this fixed by 1.0? (As this surely blocks lots of
people from using the site navigation bar...)
Comment 43•23 years ago
|
||
The patch works *now*. The problem is that it's not solving the problem in a
clean way.
It's occurred to me that this bug might be suitable for being checked in on a
1.0 *branch*, if there is such a thing, so that it goes into the 1.0 codebase
but isn't there in 1.1, so that a "real" solution can be worked out for the
future of the main codebase. But I don't know if drivers would accept that.
Anyone want to do the necessary politicking?
Comment 44•23 years ago
|
||
I have observed this in 0.9.8 release (20020213) on FreeBSD. Would somebody
with sufficient privileges please update the OS field (I wish Mozilla trusted me!).
Comment 45•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 135702 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 46•23 years ago
|
||
I'm very sorry to see that this bug is still present so close to the 1.0.0
release. I was very excited when the site navigation bar was introduced quite
some time ago, and I was quick to add LINK tags to my site
<http://www.autark.se/>, but I have gradually stopped using the bar because I
cannot rely on it. Having to do a manual reload after switching tabs is IMO
unacceptable.
I have been patient while Mozilla was in a beta stage, but as I see it, the
current state of the site navigation bar is unacceptable for release, so either
the bug must be fixed or the bar disabled (or at least hidden), in order to
prevent embarrassment when Mozilla is released to the general public.
Tested in build 20020408-14.
Comment 47•23 years ago
|
||
Per, it seems likely the site navigation bar will be backed out completely for
1.0, so this bug is the least of our worries (please don't discuss the merits of
that decision in this bug - I don't like it much either, but unless someone
other than me can create a miracle patch for bug 102992 and get it reviewed,
super-reviewed and approved to be checked in in the middle of a deep code
freeze, it is probably going to happen).
My hope was that we could check in this hacky patch and enable the toolbar by
default for 1.0, but it isn't going to happen. I guess we have to hope for 1.1
or so.
If you want *this* bug to get fixed, the way to go about it is to pester the
tabbrowser people to fix the dependent bug 106656. I don't think it's possible
to produce a clean-enough-to-get-approved patch for this bug without 106656
being fixed.
Comment 48•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 140745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 49•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 148999 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 50•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 154984 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Reporter | ||
Comment 51•23 years ago
|
||
I'm starting to think that if we don't fix this bug, we should just back out the
links toolbar. As it is, it is causing me to get very confused navigating to the
wrong page more often than it is helping me.
Comment 52•23 years ago
|
||
if this bug (which seems to depend on a fix for tabbed browsing), could we not
just disable the link toolbar when there are multiple tabs?
alternatively, how about backing out the tabbed browser? seems to have quite a
few bugs in it that aren't getting fixed...
Comment 53•23 years ago
|
||
Backing out tabbed browsing? Please don't! For many people (including myself)
this feature is the main reason to use Moz.
Comment 54•23 years ago
|
||
It seems to me everybody is picking this particular hammer up by the head rather
than by the handle - why not move the link bar and side panel *into* the content
area, so that when you switch tabs you automatically switch link bar and side panel?
This also prevents the tabs from bouncing up and down if you have "show linkbar
only when needed" active, which is visually distracting.
It seems to be that both the link bar and the side panel are logically part of
the page being viewed.
And I second the other comments - DON'T YOU DARE TOUCH MY TABBED BROWSING!
Comment 55•23 years ago
|
||
FWIW, I agree with links being sensibly associated with page content,
but I do not agree that sidebar contents should be associated with a
specific page. I have many sidebars (including the default bookmarks,
history, search sidebars) which have a much larger scope than one web
page's contents.
RE: link toolbar should be moved to just above the content, skip up
eighty-five bugs to bug 102990
-matt
Comment 56•23 years ago
|
||
If we're going for solutions as drastic as backing out the linktoolbar, I'd
suggest instead checking in the patch in bug 103428. From a user standpoint,
that patch is a complete fix to the problem (unless it's bitrotted since being
written, which is possible I guess - someone would have to check it).
The only major issue with the existing patch (other than possible bitrot) is
that it makes the tabbrowser specifically aware of the existence of the
linktoolbar, which it shouldn't have to be because the tabbrowser could
conceivably be used in a place where there isn't a linktoolbar at all. Fixing
that would require a fix for bug 106656. I've begun the attempt to raise hell in
that bug ;)
Comment 57•23 years ago
|
||
With "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.2a) Gecko/20020910"
Same bug:
I did not read all of the Additional Comments ... but the initial bug
description is still valid.
Comment 58•22 years ago
|
||
Well the patch to bug 106656 has now been checked in...
Comment 59•22 years ago
|
||
Anyone feel like trying the "work in progress patch" (that's currently marked
obsolete, but may not be any more) to see if it is now sufficient to fix the
problem? I don't have the capability to hack Mozilla any longer since my monitor
at home blew up...
The patch might have bitrotted, but with bug 106656 in the tree, an approach
along those lines should be enough to make this work without you needing to
click each tab twice.
The one other thing that would probably be worth doing is adding a check on
event.originalTarget.something (tagName maybe?) in the selectTab function to
make sure that selectTab only gets called once. Try putting a dump("selectTab:
tagname=" + event.originalTarget.tagName) into selectTab and watch the console.
You'll probably get two dumps every time you click a tab. Then you can put an
if(event.originalTarget.tagName != "whatever") return; into selectTab to filter
out one or the other of them, to avoid the penalty of doing a full refresh twice
per tab.
There are better ways to do this but I can't think of any that don't involve
accessing the Tabbrowser object's anonymous content. I still think it would be
nice if the Tabbrowser object did a preventBubble() on one or the other of the
two select events it fires.
Comment 60•22 years ago
|
||
> Anyone feel like trying the "work in progress patch"
Possibly on Thursday...
> I still think it would be nice if the Tabbrowser object did a preventBubble()
> on one or the other of the two select events it fires.
So have you filed a bug (and CC'd me) on the double select event issue?
Comment 61•22 years ago
|
||
Attachment #62996 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•22 years ago
|
![]() |
||
Comment 62•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 103051 [details] [diff] [review]
Up-to-date patch
What about XUL-as-content that happens to include a tabbed ui in the XUL? If
that's not an issue, sr=bzbarsky
Comment 63•22 years ago
|
||
> What about XUL-as-content that happens to include a tabbed ui in the XUL?
Then there won't be any links anyway, will there?
Also <tabbrowser> includes an <tabpanels onselect> so if any events bubble up
from content they'll affect <tabbrowser> as well :-P
![]() |
||
Comment 64•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 103051 [details] [diff] [review]
Up-to-date patch
> Then there won't be any links anyway, will there?
Why not? XHTML-namespace meta-tags in a XUL document _may_ work.... (they
_should_ work, but XUL is fucked up like that).
In any case, that's a core tabbrowser issue; please file it.
Attachment #103051 -
Flags: superreview+
Comment 65•22 years ago
|
||
I'm confused. Why would XUL-as-content be remotely problematic? All this patch
does is get the linktoolbar to listen to select events and refresh its content
when they happen.
All that would happen in the XUL-as-content-that-contains-a-tabbrowser case is
that the refresh would happen sometimes when it actually shouldn't. Since the
refresh would just reload the same links as already exist, I don't see a
problem, except for a potential slight slowdown on tab-switching in the nested
UI, in the unlikely case that there *are* links in the document.
Stuart.
![]() |
||
Comment 66•22 years ago
|
||
Heh. True. Well, my sr stands; someone needs to review the patch, though.
Comment 67•22 years ago
|
||
r=sballard@netreach.net on the patch, with the caveat that I can't actually test
it, so someone else will have to do that (please make sure somebody actually
does before setting has-review).
With this code in place it should be possible to update the patch in bug 103428
to work well also: I'll comment over there on exactly what it would take. I
expect that this patch will become annoying quickly without that one.
Assignee | ||
Comment 68•22 years ago
|
||
OT:
Creating the toolbar via XBL would be easy (content in XUL), but for bug 174614.
Without it, the the buttons will need to be ordered manually, which will not
give any speed benefit. (requires at least one call to
document.getElementsByTagName('link')).
In fact, much of the existing toolbar could probably be dropped into an XBL
binding attached to <head>... but that's a different bug ;)
Comment 69•22 years ago
|
||
drbrain, we already don't call getElementsByTagName except for two situations:
1) when the toolbar is turned on for the first time, so we don't have any stored
state.
2) tab switching.
#2 could be eliminated by storing all the necessary data in the tab object,
which would be great if you feel like rearchitecting the linktoolbar to make
that possible, but right now is somewhat tricky. I suppose you could just store
an array of HTMLLinkElement objects hanging off the tab object and iterate over
them on tabswitch.
#1 can't ever be eliminated because we haven't even got any code loaded at that
point (in an ideal world) so we can't possibly know what links should be present.
The conversion to XBL (bug 102992 I think) has nothing to do with page-load
performance, but rather startup and new-window performance (by deferring the
load of all linktoolbar code until it's actually needed). The majority of the
difficulty there lies in bootstrapping: when you get a Link event, you want to
call some code to add it to the toolbar, but the toolbar hasn't been created
yet. So you load the XBL binding that creates the toolbar, but by the time
that's done, you've forgotten about the Link event. Solvable problem, but it's a
pain in the neck, which is why that patch was so hard to write (and then, with
my monitor blowing up, it's stuck in perpetual limbo...)
Comment 70•22 years ago
|
||
I tested attachment #103151 [details] and it worked perfectly. I didn't find any problems
during my extensive 10 minute test. I will use this patch during my normal
browser use and will report here if I find any problems. The test was made using
cvs trunk on Linux.
In my opinion this patch is ready to be checked in. Thanks guys, great work!
Comment 71•22 years ago
|
||
Ok, we can do this the hard way, or take an easy path. |updateCurrentBrowser| in
tabbrowser.xml already does important stuff for tab switching, like selecting
content/content-primary, something you need. So I wonder why we don't add a
little snap like this:
+ if (linkToolbarUI.isLinkToolbarEnabled()) {
+ linkToolbarHandler.clearAllItems();
+ linkToolbarUI.fullSlowRefresh();
+ }
to |updateCurrentBrowser| in tabbrowser.xml? That will solve the real problem,
without using a new set of |addEventListener/removeEventListener| This will
also prevent the 'quirky ordering' in the patch for bug 173703.
![]() |
||
Comment 72•22 years ago
|
||
Because the principles of "information hiding" also known as "non-spaghetti
maintainable code" demand that tabbrowser know nothing of the existence of link
toolbar (consider the case of something like phoenix that wants to use the
<tabbrowser> widget but does not want a link toolbar. They should not have to
fork the widget....).
Comment 73•22 years ago
|
||
I prefer attachment 103051 [details] [diff] [review]. See the previous comment for why. You'll want to
listen for select events coming from <tabpanels> though, since then you'll know
for sure you get the right <browser>.
Comment 74•22 years ago
|
||
Oh well, the "non-spaghetti maintainable code" argument sounds fair but one
note, the Phoenix <tabbrowser> widget is already forked.
![]() |
||
Comment 75•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 176032 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 76•22 years ago
|
||
HJ: All the more reason to not make the linktoolbar depend on code in the
tabbrowser! Consider what happens when someone wants to write a linktoolbar
that's available as a downloadable addon to Phoenix, where their tabbrowser
doesn't have this code.
Now think how much easier it would be with the patch as it stands: all the code
is already in the linktoolbar so it can just be shipped as-is.
(Just don't get me started on the Phoenix-guys claims that the linktoolbar is a
"geek" feature and shouldn't be included...)
Btw, does anyone have any comments on bug 103428 yet? (comments over in that
bug, please...)
Comment 77•22 years ago
|
||
> You'll want to listen for select events coming from <tabpanels> though,
> since then you'll know for sure you get the right <browser>.
No you won't, becuase sometimes <tabpanels> won't fire the select event, which
is why the hack to call UpdateCurrentBrowser by hand was included. In fact, this
was one of the points of fixing the select events on the <tabs> element - the
old select event always fired before the current browser updated, and was
therefore completely useless. The new select event can be made to fire at the
right time.
Comment 78•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 176921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 79•22 years ago
|
||
FWIW, I've been using the patch in attachment #103051 [details] [diff] [review] in my regular browsing
experience for about a week now. I haven't been rigorously testing every aspect
of it, but I have been dogfooding it, and I've had no troubles. No noticeable
performance changes, no problems with wrong links showing up, and nothing seems
to have broken anywhere else.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021020
Comment 80•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 103051 [details] [diff] [review]
Up-to-date patch
Since several people seem to have tested this now and report success, and I've
reviewed the patch from a code point of view and think it looks good,
r=sballard
Attachment #103051 -
Flags: review+
Comment 81•22 years ago
|
||
will the patch get into 1.2?
![]() |
||
Comment 82•22 years ago
|
||
Has anyone even asked for approval for 1.2?
Comment 83•22 years ago
|
||
This bug requires the patch at 173703?
Comment 84•22 years ago
|
||
Er, no. What gives you that idea? It required bug 106656, but that went in
already. From reading the comments in bug 173703 it sounds like early versions
of that patch would have regressed bug 106656, but I can't find any indication
that bug 106656 was backed out...
Comment 85•22 years ago
|
||
Blame me for confusing Asa.
Comment 86•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 103051 [details] [diff] [review]
Up-to-date patch
a=blizzard on behalf of drivers for 1.2 final.
Please try to get this in before the tree closure on the morning of Nov 5, 2002
otherwise it's going to have to wait until after the branch has finished being
cut.
Attachment #103051 -
Flags: approval+
Comment 87•22 years ago
|
||
checked in
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 88•22 years ago
|
||
This bug is not fixed.
I tested with 2002110504-trunk/WinXP.
1. Create two tabs(right tab has link elements).
2. Close left tab by middle click.
All buttons on site navigation toolbar are disabled.
Comment 89•22 years ago
|
||
Related: bug 173703? (closing tab with middle-click).
![]() |
||
Comment 90•22 years ago
|
||
That's probably because closing a tab does not fire on onselect event.
I'm starting to think that tabbrowser should fire off "tabswitch" events when
tabs are switched (added, removed, whatever). Then the link toolbar could catch
them....
Comment 91•22 years ago
|
||
bz: the problem is that the tabbrowser doesn't consistently handle tab switch
events generated during a tab close (bug 173703).
Comment 92•22 years ago
|
||
Yes, the behaviour in comment 88 should be fixed when the fix for bug 173703 is
checked in (soon, hopefully). This bug (toolbar not updating on [normal] tab
switch) is fixed.
![]() |
||
Comment 93•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 179077 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 94•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 179465 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 96•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 169114 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
![]() |
||
Comment 97•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 179879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 98•22 years ago
|
||
This bug (fix) appears to have regressed. The reporter in bug 192888 suggested
trying b.m.o and Mozillazine. With 2003022308 W2K I see the site navigation
toolbar auto hide while Mozillazine is loading, or the first time you switch to
it if you let it load in the background. If you keep switching back and forth
between the two tabs the toolbar will eventually get left on the Mozillazine
tab. If you then reload Mozillazine it vanishes again.
Could somebody else verify this please?
Comment 99•22 years ago
|
||
I can verify the behavior that Arunan Bala describes with Linux build 2003020408
(about 20 days old now, I should update).
The site navigation toolbar does not autohide when you switch to a tab that does
not use page navigation links, but it does autohide when that page is first
loaded or refreshed.
Comment 100•22 years ago
|
||
Regarding comments 98 and 99: the behavior you are describing sounds correct.
This bug is not about autohide, it is about the *content* of the toolbar
changing when the tab is changed. If switching to a page with no link elements
causes the bar to be grayed out, and switching back reactivates the items, it is
behaving correctly.
The issue you are describing sounds like the intended behavior of bug 103428
(i.e. don't autohide the toolbar when switching tabs because that would cause
the tabs to jump around).
Comment 101•22 years ago
|
||
Apologies to the 50000 people on the cc list ...
> This bug is not about autohide,
I had the impression it was as bug 179465 which was about showing/hiding the
bar when switching tabs and reloading was duped against this one.
> If switching to a page with no link elements causes the bar to be grayed out,
> and switching back reactivates the items, it is behaving correctly.
I assume you mean it's populating the bar with the correct links (none); if
you have "show as needed" then when there are no links it's not behaving
correctly if showing a bar with no enabled links that then vanishes when you
reload.
Updated•17 years ago
|
Product: Core → SeaMonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•