Closed
Bug 12161
Opened 26 years ago
Closed 1 year ago
[HELPWANTED] clean up vocabulary usage
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: RDF, defect, P3)
Core Graveyard
RDF
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
Future
People
(Reporter: waterson, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: helpwanted)
Currently, our "NC" vocabulary is a pile of ad-hoc hacks that have evolved over
time. We need to go on a crusade to formalize this and publish it. I volunteer
to start.
Reporter | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M11
Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M11 → M15
Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Summary: clean up vocabulary usage → [HELPWANTED] clean up vocabulary usage
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
sigh. this'll have to wait.
Updated•25 years ago
|
QA Contact: phillip
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
no qa contact needed
Updated•25 years ago
|
Keywords: helpwanted
Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M15 → M20
Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M20 → Future
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Is there anything in particular you need cleaned up, or is this just a generic
request? I can certainly help with verifying consistency and syntax...
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
what we need is for somebody to
1. poke through the code base to catalogue the use of the
http://home.netscape.com/NC-rdf# namespace. Here's a starter list:
http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/search?string=home.netscape.com%2FNC-rdf%23
2. Optionally write an RDF/XML schema for that catalogue.
3. identify places where use of a well-known vocabulary (e.g., Dublin Core)
would be more appropriate
4. file bugs on components to fix specific problems identified in (3)
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
I have *no* idea, what you mean with tasks 1-3.
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
I did some poking around to generate a preliminary list of resources in the
NC-rdf# namespace, and the list is somewhat daunting -- it's close to 300 items
long (and I can't guarantee I didn't miss any, in fact it's likely).
There are a few issues with capitalization, producing redundant elements ("Name"
versus "name", "MIME-Type" v. "MIME-Types" v. "MIME-types"). Close to a third
of the elements appear to be supported by custom datasource code but are never
actually used.
A number of chunks of this list could probably be split off into self-contained
schemas used by a single component. That might help impose some order on
things, but this is still a pretty enormous task.
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
waterson left the building
Assignee: waterson → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
QA Contact: core.rdf
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
This seems like the kind of anal-retentive thing I'd be good at. What type of capitalization are we looking for? For example:
rdf:http://home.netscape.com/NC-rdf#name
or
rdf:http://home.netscape.com/NC-rdf#Name
Updated•7 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•