Closed Bug 129922 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

reDesign the User Interface, to get a coherent comunication between the user and Mozilla.

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: General, enhancement)

enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: LancerKMT, Assigned: mpt)

Details

Taking by example this: in Navigator menu bar: 'back', 'forward', 'reload', 'stop', 'Open Web Location...'; all are into diferents menus. I maditate it more than one time and i still dont see any sense of have all this options into diferents menus... has no logic. -'open web location...': the navigator doesnt render all the kinds of file. So ¿why da hell is this option into the File menu??!!! would someone please explain me that?. The navigator is made for render web documents, which has links to other web documents; there the meaning of the name "navigator". A *.jpg or *.txt file doesnt has links. -'Back', 'forward', 'home': ...oh my God. These are under a menu called 'go'. I dont know in yours, but in my mozilla the same two letters("g" and "o") appears into a button at the right of the address box(in the navigation toolbar); and this button make mozilla go to the web location wrote in the address box. If i write the word 'forward' into that address box and then a click the button 'go', mozilla try to find "www.forward.com", and that is not the same thing that mozilla do when i click 'forward' into the go menu. again Can someone explain me that?. The 'home' option is just a shortcut, a bookmark... ...what is it doing into a menu with 'back' and 'forward' options??? 'Reload', 'Stop': Are into the same menu where is placed options to show and/or hide toolbars... I guess that is enough to explain the no-sense with these. Since i been using mozilla(about one and a half years) i have found a lot of bugs in the user interface (I was an Architectural studient and actually i work in the Graphic Design ambient). The User Interface is the language used by the application, for the comunication with the user. If this language has no coherence, the comunication between the user and the application turn into something dark which moves away the user from the application. The good aplications are good not only because are efficient fast or compatibles... etc. One of the principal reasons which makes an application good is its user interface. I tell you this because i have a long experience using OS(from TOS to MS Windows) and aplications; and because i know the meaning of the word "language". I will give you the perfect example, Photoshop. Is in the top and has its prestige not for be an easy to use aplication or for its features. The Photoshop's language of comunication with the user, make it a graphic design application and not another kid toy.
There are already bugs covering this, although the only one that comes to mind is bug 69555. Also, please read the bug reporting guidlines at http://www.mozilla.org/quality/bug-writing-guidelines.html. Try to keep your bug reports more concise instead of rambling so much; the developers are more likely to listen.
Changing summary from: the bigest bug of Mozilla I guess. to: Back, Forward, Reload, Stop, Open Web Location... are in differents menus Sev: cri -> nor
Severity: critical → normal
Summary: the bigest bug of Mozilla I guess. → Back, Forward, Reload, Stop, Open Web Location... are in differents menus
Changing summary from: Back, Forward, Reload, Stop, Open Web Location... are in differents menus to: Rebuild of the User Interface Language
Summary: Back, Forward, Reload, Stop, Open Web Location... are in differents menus → Rebuild of the User Interface Language
Severity: normal → enhancement
This should be marked as a duplicate of bug 108099.
Marking as DUPE. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 108099 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Lancer, XUL won't be rewritten just because a menu should in your opinion be at a different location. Thus, "Back, Forward, Reload, Stop, Open Web Location... are in different menus" should be the right summary. Anyways, this is a dupe.
I guess this is going to be funny... >------------/ I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT PROGRAMING /------------< I am opening this bug, not because ...""i'd like to have a HOME button besides the navigations buttons in the navigation toolbar, because i miss it"" ...as i did read in a mozilla newsgroup mail. I am not joking, i talking seriuslly. You can make what you think is right with XUL. What i am trying to explain with that ONE example i gave, that there is a Big thing into Mozilla which doesnt seems to have a real, serius and deep work. I am talking about the LANGUAGE(not xul) of its user intarface. I am talking about the comunication between the browser and the user. Mozilla actually use a language in its user interface which seems to has been built based on the others render aplications of webdocuments; and not based on what it perform: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=57968&action=view Personally i think this can be the first big change immediatly possible to do, before the 1.0 be released (...well i dont know how much possible it is): To reorder all the options of the menu bar and change some names too. I mean a BIG change. This is not an opinion. I guess this is necessary for make of Mozilla Browser not an aplication which only pretend to be fast compatible and efficient; because Mozilla will be, wanted or not, fast, compatible and efficient. Then the only thing left, is go to a next step: make of Mozilla an Authentic, Mature and Evolved Aplication. And the start point for this, is to build a COHERENT LANGUAGE for its user interface. And not one based on the actuals and wrong standars. The 99% of the people who report bugs about make changes on toolbars, menus or things like that, do it just because they think... ""i'd like to have a HOME button besides the navigations buttons in the navigation toolbar, because i miss it"". I believe this is not one of those cases. Please read the bug one more time, and think again about to mark this as duplicate bug. Because that thing about 'back' 'forward' 'reload' 'sto... was an example; the meaning of this bug is more bigest than only make menu changes. · ¡And dont forget to visit latinmoz! http://latinmoz.f2g.net/ ·
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Nothing from your elaboration changes the fact that this is a duplicate of bug 108099 (nominated for 1.0). Please read the details of that bug more closely, and move your comments there. bug 108099 is about the complete restructuring of the mozilla menu system. In addition, there are 14 dependencies and 5 blockers that all cover the same general area. In other words, there is no need for a bug report as wide ranging as this one. Further discussion should take place in a suitable newsgroup. Please read the bug reporting guidelines as suggested: http://www.mozilla.org/quality/bug-writing-guidelines.html Reports should be clear, concise and focussed on one particular issue. Everyone else - sorry for the spam! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 108099 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
I am having an extremely difficult time understanding what you are trying to say even after reading the bug report 4 times over, but this 'language' thing is confusing everybody. I'm rewording the summary, but I'm sure that I missed something because I can't understand the bug report. We refer to a User Interface Language as XUL which is the core programming xml- based toolkit that defines the user interface. In bugzilla, please don't just file general "fix the UI bugs," because that doesn't help. One bug per problem please. Next time you report bugs, please use the Bugzilla Helper at http:// www.mozilla.org/quality/help/bug-form.html. Thanks for using mozilla and reporting bugs, Zach User Interface Design QA
I'm almost certain that the word he is searching for is rather "Interface", e.g. he refers to HIG's (Human Interface Guidelines). Note that he isn't a native English speaker (I'm not either). I still think this is a dupe though.
Changing summary from: Rebuild of the User Interface Language to: reDesign the User Interface, to get a coherent comunication between the user and Mozilla.
Summary: Rebuild of the User Interface Language → reDesign the User Interface, to get a coherent comunication between the user and Mozilla.
Please read what i have wrote here: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108099#c23
Lancer, this bug is "RESOLVED DUBPLICATE". Either REOPEN it (with giving a reason why), or leave it.
What i am suggesting is to do a lot of diferent changes with the intention of reorder Mozilla. Mozilla in about 5 years has became a completely diferent program. And even when i still feel mozilla slow, i believe that the user interface has not to be only the fact that mozilla can be skinned ...! The user interface IS and has to take a more bigest important. As i said, i believe wanted or not, mozilla is going to be fast, compatible and efficient enough. So the next step is give to the user an intelligent, an evolved user interface. I guess i am talking about design. All the current aplications are the following, and they has nothing more to offer: > WINDOWS > TITLEBARS > SCROLLBARS > '¡%&#·ING TOOLBARS > BUTTONS > MENUS WHICH ORDER OF ITS OPTIONS IS INCREDIBLY INCOHERENT > '%&¡#·ING SECONDARY CLICK MENUS WHICH APPEAR IN ALL PLACES GENERATING MORE TRASH > ETC. Honestly, since i use computers, i had never, never, NEVER like all this stuff, but the menus. And this is not a personal point of view, is the point of view of an Architect. They are not starndards. They doesnt give a coherent language. They are '%&¡#· . Please, read carefuly this bug: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130798 I suggest have many bugs like that, and have this to talk about each one of those and how they are going to be integrated in mozilla. Not a talk about code or programing, a talk about the design of the user interface, the visual design; where resides the language of comunication with the user.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
we will *not* fix this the way you want it fixed. resolving as wontfix. UID qa has already duped, there is no way you'll get what you want. please stop wasting our time. Instead post to the newsgroups until the cows come home.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago23 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
..."please stop wasting our time"... I took my time to give you the oportunity of FIX MOZILLA. I Dare you, you are not going anywhere. Anyone, like Opera and/or Microsoft, move ONE finger and ALL mozilla is history, FIVE YEARS OF WORK GO TO TRASH. bye.
I cant wait to see 1.0... Is going to be so fun!
Severity: enhancement → blocker
Target Milestone: --- → M1
v=aha
Severity: blocker → enhancement
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Target Milestone: M1 → ---
Component: User Interface Design → Browser-General
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.