Closed
Bug 142703
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
mail headers all reloaded and header labeling lost
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Networking: IMAP, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: bugbusta, Assigned: Bienvenu)
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
703 bytes,
text/plain
|
Details | |
878 bytes,
patch
|
mscott
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
818 bytes,
patch
|
mscott
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0rc1)
Gecko/20020417
BuildID: 2002041711
upon opening inbox ocassionally all headers are lost and need to be reloaded
from IMAP server. Additionally, all priority labeling information is lost in
this process.
Reproducible: Sometimes
Steps to Reproduce:
Not sure how to reproduce this exactly yet. It seems sporadic and could be
related to server changes (however, other email software doesn't encounter this
problem).
Expected Results: only new headers should be loaded, old headers should be
saved locally.
Additionally, Mozilla should encode priority labeling into message headers on
the IMAP server so that priority can be determined from any node and cannot be lost.
this bug is reminicent of bug 138065 , but I'm not using L2TP.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
my guess is that your IMAP server is rolling UID validity. Is it a cyrus server?
There are some old versions of the Cyrus server (or is Courier? I can't remember
for sure) that have trouble if you use keywords, which we do for labels, that
result in the server rolling UID validity, which forces us to redownload the
headers (the IMAP RFC requires this). We do store labels on the server, if the
server supports it.
Component: Mail Window Front End → Networking: IMAP
As far as I know it's a M$ exchange server. Does exchange not allow for server
side priority labels?
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
No, Exchange doesn't support user defined keywords, IIRC. It's not a real IMAP
server; it's just some imap protocol support glued on top of an Exchange MAPI
1.0 server. There's not much we can do about this.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•23 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Updated•21 years ago
|
Product: MailNews → Core
![]() |
||
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
I've got a similar problem with TB 1.0 and Seamonkey 1.7.5:
Due to my config (multiple clients running on different machines at the same
time, server locks mailbox while accessed), I get a popop "The current command
did not succeed. The mail server responded: Could not select mailbox".
That's ok, but at next successful access to this folder (mostly inbox) the
corresponding .msf is recreated, due to this all labels are lost.
UID's seem to be the same, so I guess it's a MailNews bug? (Or is it the server
once again? :)
![]() |
||
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
A fix has been checked in for bug 235354. Does that also address this problem?
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
Sorry -- I marked this one by mistake, the problem described here seems to be
unrelated. But, see bug 170247.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
I don't know if this will fix the problem (it all depends on the type of url
being run) but it should fix some potential problems.
Attachment #179080 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott)
![]() |
||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #179080 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott) → superreview+
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
patch above checked in to trunk - please try tomorrow's builds, if you think you
can help test this, thx!
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
I'm going to mark fixed - please re-open if this still happens.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 12•21 years ago
|
||
this should fix the remaining problem. If the folder is locked at startup,
we'll issue a select, ignore the fact that it failed, and then issue the acl
commands. If those commands succeed, they'll clear the commandFailed state, and
we'll think the select succeeded. So, if the last command failed, say we didn't
issue the select, and everything should fall out.
Attachment #179335 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott)
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•21 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
![]() |
||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #179335 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott) → superreview+
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 13•21 years ago
|
||
ok, fix checked in - please try tomorrow's build. Thx for the help, Ulf.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago → 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•17 years ago
|
Product: Core → MailNews Core
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•