Closed
Bug 150900
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Help | Release Notes doesn't go to Release Notes
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: UI Design, defect)
SeaMonkey
UI Design
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.5final
People
(Reporter: contact2009, Assigned: bugzilla)
References
Details
(Keywords: fixed1.5, helpwanted, useless-UI)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
2.20 KB,
patch
|
gerv
:
review+
jag+mozilla
:
superreview+
asa
:
approval1.5+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Using 1.1alpha Build ID: 2002060704, Windows 98, the Help | Release Notes menu sends the browser to the Releases page, not the Release Notes page. Preferably, that should send the user to the Release Notes page. Alternatively, we could change the name of the menu item to "Releases."
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Keywords: mozilla1.0.1
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
-> GUI features
Assignee: Matti → blaker
Component: Browser-General → XP Apps: GUI Features
QA Contact: imajes-qa → paw
not help, [mozillazine]helpwanted
Assignee: oeschger → blaker
Component: Help → XP Apps: GUI Features
Keywords: mozilla1.0.1 → helpwanted
QA Contact: tpreston → paw
Reproduced using FizzillaCFM/2002091014 on 10.1.5. Setting All/All.
OS: Windows 98 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Keywords: mozilla1.2
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 175485 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Keywords: mozilla1.3
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Summary: Help | Release Notes menu doesn't work right → Help | Release Notes goes to releases, not release notes
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
> Alternatively, we could change the name of the menu item to "Releases." No point in linking to the releases page (how does that 'help' the user?). What we need is a variable for the version string that can be accessed from chrome javascript, returning a value such as "1.0" or "1.2b". Assuming that variable were to be called $version, we would make Help | Release Notes point to "http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla" & $version & "/" . This would work around the problem of having to update the URL every time we do a new release.
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Summary: Help | Release Notes goes to releases, not release notes → Help | Release Notes doesn't go to Release Notes
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Keywords: mozilla1.2,
mozilla1.3
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
Let's not create a new variable for the version. Instead, let's point to a PHP file on the mozilla.org web site, then do browser sniffing and redirect the user to the appropriate page. This leads to only two issues, neither one real. The first concerns users who are spoofing their user agent identity. The second concerns Mozilla users who want to see release notes for versions other than those of their current browsers. All of the actual release notes pages will still be static HTML files, They can see an index page listing all release notes. Thus, people can still see their release notes. It's just that if you take the trouble to spoof your user agent, you will have to manually select which release notes you want to see.
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.4a?
Keywords: useless-UI
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
The Mozilla website does not support PHP, or any dynamic content, for that
matter. Let's do the simple thing, please:
> What we need is a variable for the version string that can be accessed from
> chrome javascript, returning a value such as "1.0" or "1.2b".
We have one. It's called the user agent.
Gerv
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
Not fully tested.
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
Attachment #115539 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•22 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.4a? → blocking1.4a-
Updated•21 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.4.x?
Comment 12•21 years ago
|
||
If a patch in this bug gets proper reviews, feel free to request approval to land in 1.4.x but we're not going to hold the 1.4.1 release for this.
Flags: blocking1.4.x? → blocking1.4.x-
Comment 13•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 115547 [details] [diff] [review] much better patch r=gerv, for what that's worth - I've tested it and it works. Gerv
Attachment #115547 -
Flags: review+
Comment 14•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 115547 [details] [diff] [review] much better patch Requesting sr= from blake (who is also the module owner.) Gerv
Attachment #115547 -
Flags: superreview?(blake)
Comment 15•21 years ago
|
||
while a sr from blake would surely be accepted, the xpfe module owner is jag (see http://www.mozilla.org/owners.html)
Comment 16•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 115547 [details] [diff] [review] much better patch sr=jag
Attachment #115547 -
Flags: superreview?(blake) → superreview+
Comment 17•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 115547 [details] [diff] [review] much better patch Requesting approval. Gerv
Attachment #115547 -
Flags: approval1.5?
Comment 18•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 115547 [details] [diff] [review] much better patch a=asa (on behalf of drivers) for checkin to the Mozilla 1.5 branch
Attachment #115547 -
Flags: approval1.5? → approval1.5+
Comment 19•21 years ago
|
||
Fixed. Checking in allmakefiles.sh; /cvsroot/mozilla/allmakefiles.sh,v <-- allmakefiles.sh new revision: 1.436.4.1; previous revision: 1.436 done Removing xpfe/global/resources/locale/en-US/region.dtd; /cvsroot/mozilla/xpfe/global/resources/locale/en-US/region.dtd,v <-- region.dtd new revision: delete; previous revision: 1.19.6 done RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/xpfe/global/resources/locale/en-US/Attic/region.dtd.in,v done Checking in xpfe/global/resources/locale/en-US/region.dtd.in; /cvsroot/mozilla/xpfe/global/resources/locale/en-US/Attic/region.dtd.in,v <-- region.dtd.in new revision: 1.1.2.1; previous revision: 1.1 done Gerv
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.5final
Comment 20•21 years ago
|
||
I'm not sure this was such a great idea. First release after this goes in, and we have a page with the wrong link (bug 219566). Having a link to a generic page is better than linking to the wrong thing...
Why did this land on the 1.5 branch but not on the trunk? Are you sure that content.version should be tied to the Mozilla release version? (It would be nice if it's true, but I'm not sure it is.)
Comment 22•21 years ago
|
||
If this is going to go in to the trunk, there should really be placeholder pages or something for future releases. e.g. current trunk builds would point to http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.6a/ but that is currently 404.
Comment 23•21 years ago
|
||
I emailed kairo to check very carefully that this was the right thing for content.version. Michael: good point. We should have placeholder pages. Gerv
Comment 24•21 years ago
|
||
This has now been checked into the trunk, and a placeholder page for 1.6a has been checked into www.mozilla.org CVS. Gerv
Should lang.version do the same thing as content.version?
Comment 26•21 years ago
|
||
dbaron: quite possibly, I don't know. There are other bugs open on using the same technique for other places in the tree where the version number is required. Gerv
Comment 27•21 years ago
|
||
dbaron: Ideally, lang.version should follow this approach as well as all contents.rdf that contain a localeVersion string. We could get rid of my big patches for every release with this approach and would fix bug 154927 - look into that for more info. I'd really love to see a patch for this ;-)
Comment 28•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 102423 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Core → Mozilla Application Suite
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•