Closed
Bug 183415
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
PAC: Apparent typo
Categories
(Core :: Networking, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: nate, Assigned: Biesinger)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
1013 bytes,
patch
|
darin.moz
:
review+
bzbarsky
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021029 Phoenix/0.4
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021029 Phoenix/0.4
I can't tell if this is a bug, but it sure looks suspicious. I was reading
through to see how proxy autoconfiguration is handled, and came across this code
in nsProxyAutoConfig.js:
222 if (!iid.equals(nsIProxyAutoConfig) &&
223 !!iid.equals(Components.interfaces.nsIStreamListener) &&
224 !iid.equals(Components.interfaces.nsISupports)) {
Can this double negative in line 223 be intentional? This line came in as a
patch for bug #53080, and was like this even in the earliest versions of the
patch. Could someone knowledgeable take a glance at it?
Apologies if I'm not seeing the obvious.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Keywords: clean-report
Summary: Apparent typo in proxy PAC autoconfig → Apparent typo in proxy PAC autoconfig
-> whitebox, now that I think about it...
QA Contact: benc → ashishbhatt
Summary: Apparent typo in proxy PAC autoconfig → PAC: Apparent typo
![]() |
||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Yeah, that looks totally wrong. That object implements nsIStreamListener...
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
Assignee: dougt → cbiesinger
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #142567 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #142567 -
Flags: review?(darin)
![]() |
||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 142567 [details] [diff] [review]
the obvious patch
sr=bzbarsky
Attachment #142567 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky) → superreview+
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 142567 [details] [diff] [review]
the obvious patch
hmm.. seems like it should also support nsIRequestObserver.
want to add a line for that?
r=darin
Attachment #142567 -
Flags: review?(darin) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
checked in with added nsIRequestObserver
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•