Closed
Bug 193282
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
extremely slow JavaScript to Java-applet calls
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Java: OJI, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
EXPIRED
People
(Reporter: alexey.gaidukov, Assigned: joshua.xia)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; ru-RU; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021123
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; ru-RU; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021123
the test.html file
<html>
<head>
<script>
function testfun() {
var applet = document.getElementById("test"); // Mozilla version
// var applet = test; // IE vesrion
var longValue = applet.getLong();
var beginTime = new Date;
for(var i=0; i < 10000; i++) {
longValue--;
applet.setLong(longValue);
longValue = applet.getLong();
}
var endTime = new Date;
alert("Processing time:\n"
+ "begin: " + beginTime + "\n"
+ "end:" + endTime + "\n");
}
</script>
</head>
<body>
<applet codebase="file:///C:/" // set yours codebase
code="test.class"
mayscript
id="test"
width="200"
height="200">
</applet>
<input type=button onclick="testfun()" value="Click me">
</body>
</html>
the test.java file
import java.awt.*;
import java.applet.*;
import java.lang.*;
final public class test extends Applet
{
static int value = 1000*1000*1000;
public void paint(Graphics g)
{
g.drawString("All right", 50, 100);
}
public int getLong() {
return value;
}
public void setLong(int v) {
value = v-1;
}
}
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Store test.html and test.java files from the details section to your local HDD.
2. Compile test.java file
3. Change applet's codebase to your location in the test.html file
4. Run test.html in Mozilla. Wait while applet is starting. Click the button.
To start the test in IE comment the line 5 and uncomment the line 6 in the file
test.html
See the great difference in the performance!!!
Actual Results:
JavaScript to Java-applet calls in Mozilla 1.2.1 up to 30 times slower than
JScript to Java calls in IE 6.0. JavaScript to Java-applet calls in Mozilla 1.3
beta up to 4 times slower than in Mozilla 1.2.1.
Expected Results:
Much faster calls of Java-applet functions from JavaScript.
|
||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
.
Assignee: asa → rogerl
Component: Browser-General → Live Connect
QA Contact: asa → pschwartau
|
|
||
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
---> OJI
Assignee: rogerl → joshua.xia
Component: Live Connect → OJI
QA Contact: pschwartau → petersen
Summary: extremely slow javaScript to Java-applet calls → extremely slow JavaScript to Java-applet calls
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
Mozilla 1.3final perform this test up to 3 times faster than 1.2.1. But it is
still much slower than IE 6.0 (near 10 times)!!!
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
theClass = java.lang.Class.forName("java.lang.String");
array = java.lang.reflect.Array.newInstance(theClass, 10000);
var javaString = new java.lang.String("Hello world!");
//example1
for(i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
array[i] = javaString;
}
//example2
for(i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
array[i];
}
Example1 performs up to 10 times faster than example2. Why? Is it Java plugin
bug? JRE 1.4.2_01.
|
|
||
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
I don't know a lot about JavaScript/Java, but could this be a duplicate of Bug
191035?
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
The first call to an applet from JS takes some seconds. Next calls are faster
but there are much slower then the same calls from MS IE to Java. This is not
the same bug. Calls to JRE 1.5 beta 1 is a little bit faster then calls to JRE
1.4.2
|
|
||
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01".
This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that
bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are
highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code.
While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we
are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce
this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a
copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and
you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug
(given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more
reproduction information if you have it.
If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not
changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
The latest beta releases can be obtained from:
Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/
Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html
Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
|
|
||
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above
comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•