Open Bug 198165 Opened 22 years ago Updated 2 years ago

[ps] Print to File Using Postscript/Default Creates Unviewable PostScript Files

Categories

(Core :: Layout: Text and Fonts, defect)

x86
Linux
defect

Tracking

()

UNCONFIRMED

People

(Reporter: shlomif, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: intl)

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 When printing this document to a file using Postscript/Default, the generated PostScript file is very unviewable using gv, and requires a lot of time to be rendered. (so long I just cannot wait so much) Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the URL. 2. Invoke File -> Print 3. Choose Print to File 4. Choose PostScript/Default as the Printer 5. Press the Print Button 6. Invoke "gv mozilla.ps" from the command line. Actual Results: I got a file that took a lot of time to render Expected Results: Create a good Postscript file.
Did you have antialiasing turned on in gv? I'd suggest turning it off when viewing Mozilla output, since Mozilla does its own font stuff.... (Also, shouldn't the quality of the file be measured by how well it prints rather than how well gv can view it?)
With anti-aliasing turned off the file is viewed quickly enough. However, the fonts are not displayed correctly in accordance to bug 178057 (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178057)
Does this belong in Bidi or printing?
Simon Montagu wrote: > Does this belong in Bidi or printing? Printing, PostScript module...
Summary: Print to File Using Postscript/Default Creates Unviewable PostScript Files → [ps] Print to File Using Postscript/Default Creates Unviewable PostScript Files
Hi Shlomi I am unable to reproduce this problem as the URL is no longer accessible. Are you able to confirm if this problem still exists? Thanks
OK, I restored the file. This time it's in a new URL. I should note that now it does not take a long time to render using gv (but then again, I upgraded PostScript recently), but it looks entirely wrong.
Please, try a recent nightly. Also note that there are a few different printing modules. If you try a recent nightly with gtk2+xft enabled, it should work more or less fine.
Keywords: intl
Well the most recent nightly build with gtk2+xft indeed renders the document to PostScript more or less fine. Should I also try without gtk2+xft?
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Component: Layout: BiDi Hebrew & Arabic → Layout: Text
QA Contact: zach → layout.fonts-and-text
Assignee: mozilla → nobody
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.