Closed
Bug 199018
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Hall of Fame
Categories
(Bugzilla :: bugzilla.org, enhancement)
Bugzilla
bugzilla.org
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: jpyeron, Assigned: gerv)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
252 bytes,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
7.72 KB,
text/html
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.0.3705) Build Identifier: n/a From the developers mailing list... Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 10:20:06 +0000 From: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org> Reply-To: developers@bugzilla.org To: developers@bugzilla.org Subject: Hall of Fame Here's a quick draft before I go for the weekend. Any important projects or companies I've missed? Gerv <snip> Free Software Projects: Linux Kernel: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Gnome: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ KDE: http://bugs.kde.org/ XFree86: http://bugs.xfree86.org/ Mozilla: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org Open Office: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi Apache Project: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ Wine: http://bugs.winehq.com/ AbiWord: http://bugzilla.abisource.com/ Squid: http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/ Lyx: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/ ProFTPD: http://bugs.proftpd.org/ xiph.org: http://bugs.xiph.org/ Spam Assassin: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/ Darwin: http://www.opendarwin.org/bugzilla/ OpenSSH: http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/ (and many more smaller ones) Linux Distributions: Red Hat: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ Mandrake: https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi Gentoo: http://bugs.gentoo.org/ TurboLinux: http://the.turbolinux.co.jp/bugzilla/ Conectiva: http://distro.conectiva.com/bugzilla/ Linux From Scratch: http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/ Blue Linux: http://bugzilla.bluelinux.org/ SOT Linux: https://www.sotlinux.org/bugzilla/ Trustix: http://www.trustix.net/bugs/ SourceMage: http://bugs.sourcemage.org/ Companies: Ximian: http://bugzilla.ximian.com/ NASA: http://itos.gsfc.nasa.gov/~bugzilla/ SGI: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/ Id Software: http://zerowing.idsoftware.com/bugzilla/ IBM: http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linux/bugzilla/ Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 21:30:03 +1100 From: Bradley Baetz <bbaetz@acm.org> Reply-To: developers@bugzilla.org To: developers@bugzilla.org Subject: Re: Hall of Fame GCC is moving to bugzilla 2.17.<mumble> RSN, I believe Bradley Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:15:25 -0500 From: Casey Gregoire <caseyg@chsamerica.com> Reply-To: developers@bugzilla.org To: developers@bugzilla.org Subject: Re: Hall of Fame Do you only want links directly to the company Bugzilla page? We may not be publicly giving access to Bugzilla at this time. I am still seeking permission from my employer as well for this. Thanks, Casey Gregoire Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:35:59 +0000 From: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org> Reply-To: developers@bugzilla.org To: developers@bugzilla.org Subject: Re: Hall of Fame Casey Gregoire wrote: > Do you only want links directly to the company Bugzilla page? We may not be > publicly giving access to Bugzilla at this time. I am still seeking > permission from my employer as well for this. Given that we cannot list every Bugzilla or Bugzilla-using company out there, and that this is a marketing tool, I propose the following criteria for HOF entry: Either: - Public Bugzilla we can link to (public as in "you can search it") - High-profile open source project or well-known company Or: - Private Bugzilla - Extremely well-known company or company with kudos attached (e.g. NASA) The latter would be a pretty short list, I think. I suppose we could have a top section with logos and links, and a bottom section which is just a list of company/project names. Gerv Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:22:33 -0800 From: Myk Melez <myk@mozilla.org> Reply-To: developers@bugzilla.org To: developers@bugzilla.org Subject: Re: Hall of Fame Gervase Markham wrote: > Casey Gregoire wrote: > >> Do you only want links directly to the company Bugzilla page? We may >> not be >> publicly giving access to Bugzilla at this time. I am still seeking >> permission from my employer as well for this. > > > Given that we cannot list every Bugzilla or Bugzilla-using company out > there, Why not? > and that this is a marketing tool, Part of the marketing message is that everybody uses it, so you should too. If the list gets too long we can break private companies down by category (internet, health care, etc.), with the corollary benefit that companies looking into Bugzilla can see similar companies already using it. Note, however, that we will never list every Bugzilla installation out there, since many will choose to remain private. I think our list isn't nearly long enough at this point for us to worry about having too many names on it. -myk Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
whoops, ie/frontpage garbled the first one.
Attachment #118326 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
just an idea...
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Several thoughts: - Although we've so far referred to it as a "Hall of Fame", if it's going to contain everyone, then it's not one. "Bugzilla Users List"? - The Free Software Projects list should include all of the big projects: Gnome, KDE, Star Office, X, Apache, Mozilla. - I'm not convinced about repeating ourselves between the top section and the alphabetical section. - Please remove the "Featured Developers" section; I don't think it fits here. - I like the alphabetical idea. Two columns might improve matters. - We need a numerical total at the top :-) Gerv
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Name not relevant, nor do I care on name: let someone else pick it. Top section Hall of Fame, followed by ALL list. Original Ideal was to put HOF on about.html, but that causes 2 locations for update. That is messy. Repitition(sp?) is correct for 2 reasons: 1) it is difficult to remember to remove/add from whole list when re-ranking the HOF. 2) they made it into the HOF don't they deserve it? ... remove the "Featured Developers" section ... The idea was to take the top 10 active developers(or companies supporting developers) for each [day/month/quarter/whatever] and list them. Someone create a policy for deciding who/how many get listed. I am too lazy to ballence the columns, can HTML do it for me? I am all so too lazy/inept to count, automated ideas sollicted...
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Looks like this is going on the web page, not the guide...
Assignee: jake → justdave
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Documentation → bugzilla.org
Ever confirmed: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
This is now done: http://www.bugzilla.org/installation_list.html . Gerv
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•