Open
Bug 201756
Opened 21 years ago
Updated 2 months ago
Implement a weekly bug summary report
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Reporting/Charting, enhancement)
Bugzilla
Reporting/Charting
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: dberlin, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030407 Phoenix/0.5+ Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030407 Phoenix/0.5+ This is a port of GNOME's weekly bug summary cgi, ported to CVS tip. I also rewrote some queries for a large speedup. Needs templatization, but i can't really see how to go about it in a sane way. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #120291 -
Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
OS: MacOS X → All
Hardware: Macintosh → All
Summary: weekly bug summary report → Implement a weekly bug summary report
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
confirming enhancement request
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
No, this is a bit different to bug 16009 - it's a sort of "weekly overview" of everything, rather than being a week-on-week plot of various metrics. But, as dberlin says, this needs quite a lot of work (templatisation, etc.) before it can be checked in. I can't see myself having time for it for quite a while - bug 16009 is, of course, a higher priority. Gerv
Updated•18 years ago
|
QA Contact: mattyt-bugzilla → default-qa
Updated•18 years ago
|
Assignee: gerv → bugzilla-mozilla
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 3.2
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 350243 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 350243 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
Bugzilla 3.2 is now frozen. Only enhancements blocking 3.2 or specifically approved for 3.2 may be checked in to the 3.2 branch. If you would like to nominate your enhancement for Bugzilla 3.2, set the "blocking3.2" flag to "?". Then, either the target milestone will be changed back, or the blocking3.2 flag will be granted, if we will accept this enhancement for Bugzilla 3.2. This particular bug has not been touched in over eight months, and thus is being retargeted to "---" instead of "Bugzilla 4.0". If you believe this is a mistake, feel free to retarget it to Bugzilla 4.0.
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 3.2 → ---
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: bugzilla-mozilla → charting
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
I implemented this weekly bug summary feature as an extension compatible with Bugzilla 3.6 and above, see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011. I could maybe release it as an extension somewhere.
Comment 10•13 years ago
|
||
GNOME Bugzilla (currently 3.4.x) also has an extension for this. See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=weekly-bug-summary.html . The code is located at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bgo-maintainers/bugzilla.gnome.org/3.4/files/head:/extensions/weekly-bug-summary/
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Interested in running this extension on BZ 4.2 I get an error Can't use attachments.status as a field name. Traceback: at Bugzilla/Field.pm line 1315 Bugzilla::Field::get_field_id(...) called at /loader/0x7fd875387970/Bugzilla/Extension/WeeklyBugSummary/Util.pm line 759 Bugzilla::Extension::WeeklyBugSummary::Util::get_patch_reviewers_list(...) called at /loader/0x7fd875387970/Bugzilla/Extension/WeeklyBugSummary/Util.pm line 152 Bugzilla::Extension::WeeklyBugSummary::Util::_page_weekly_bug_summary(...) called at /loader/0x7fd875387970/Bugzilla/Extension/WeeklyBugSummary/Util.pm line 40 Bugzilla::Extension::WeeklyBugSummary::Util::page(...) called at ./extensions/WeeklyBugSummary/Extension.pm line 12 Bugzilla::Extension::WeeklyBugSummary::page_before_template(...) called at Bugzilla/Hook.pm line 33 Bugzilla::Hook::process(...) called at /Library/WebServer/Documents/bugzilla/page.cgi line 84
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
OK, commented out that line aand see some results. Noticed it is still GNOME specific so it stops here for me.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Comment hidden (spam) |
Updated•2 months ago
|
Attachment #9386541 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•