204029 - does not load cd covers when i click on movie title to download image

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(SeaMonkey :: General, defect)

Description

[As7r080y]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401

when i click on a movie title and then click on an option to download the cover
the image placeholder comes up but will not load the image up. In IE this does
work fine however... what is suppose to happen is you click on eg. FRONT button
and the image will load  then you right click and SAVE... unfortuantly this does
not work in mozilla i have also tried this on a friends machine running Linux
and the same problem.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Load the url i have specified
2. Select a movie title from the list
3. then click on what you want to download eg. FRONT, BACK, INLAY buttons 

Actual Results:  
The image will not load.

Expected Results:  
The image should have loaded so i can save the image to my harddrive..

There are no error messages...

Comment 1

[Bill Mason]

On clicking a link to submit the page is throwing a JS error:
Error: document.download.submit.focus is not a function

Comment 2

[Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky]]

Hey jst.....

So on this page, there is an <img name="submit"> and the page uses
document.form.submit to access the _image_.

As in, your recent change to not let form.submit() be shadowed breaks this.

Of course both document.form.submit() and document.form.submit.focus() work in
IE; the question is simply which one would be used by more sites.... (not just
.focus() for the second one, but all possible accesses to an input named "submit").

Comment 3

[Johnny Stenback (:jst)]

Fixed. Backed out the fix for bug 148782 (which caused this bug).

Comment 4

[harm]

note: backing out this fix, does not seem to fix bug 148782 at all.
(I can't download the actual covers on http://www.cdcovers.cc/dvd_i.php. tried
with 1.4b/W2K)

note2:  IE seems to handle both the site mentioned in bug 148782 as well as
sites hit by this bug. So the 2 things don't seem to be mutual exclusive....

Comment 5

[harm]

some errors in my previous comment (accidently added to this bug)

bug 148782 (twice)   ->   this bug
this bug -> bug 148782