Closed Bug 205346 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

BeOS build warnings

Categories

(NSS :: Tools, defect)

x86
BeOS
defect
Not set
trivial

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED

People

(Reporter: timeless, Assigned: timeless)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

/swap/BEOS/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/lib/secutil.c: In function `SECU_ErrorStringRaw': /swap/BEOS/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/lib/secutil.c:2498: warning: zero-length format string /swap/BEOS/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/lib/secpwd.c: In function `SEC_GetPassword': /swap/BEOS/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/lib/secpwd.c:91: warning: implicit declaration of function `isatty'
Attached patch fix (obsolete) — Splinter Review
unistd.h defines isatty for BeOS; isatty isn't used in the other files so i'd suggest removing their prototypes.
Attachment #123019 - Flags: review?(wtc)
Comment on attachment 123019 [details] [diff] [review] fix The declarations of the isatty prototype in keyutil.c and keystuff.c are for SunOS 4, whose system headers are missing a lot of declarations. Since we no longer support SunOS 4, it is not necessary to modify the code ifdef'd with SunOS 4. I will attach a new patch that also fixes the other compiler warning.
Attachment #123019 - Flags: review?(wtc) → review-
Attached patch fix v1.1Splinter Review
Attachment #123019 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #123039 - Flags: review?(timeless)
Fix checked into the NSS tip (3.9). It is not necessary to backport the fix to any release branch because neither of the warnings is a bug. In particular, isatty() returns int, which is the return type of an undeclared C function.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Component: Build → Tools
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 3.9
Comment on attachment 123039 [details] [diff] [review] fix v1.1 Posthumous r+ :) thanks for fixing the other warning, I had that somewhere. As for the other files, it just didn't seem like there was any reason for the declarations since the functions being decalred weren't being called. i suppose if at some later time someone did try calling them it would be best to have the declarations present.
Attachment #123039 - Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
vrfy fixed (secpwd.c rev 1.12; secutil.c rev 1.45)
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: