Closed
Bug 214447
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Shorten attribute and method names in nsIAccessible
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Core
Disability Access APIs
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: aaronlev, Assigned: aaronlev)
Details
(Keywords: access)
Attachments
(1 file, 3 obsolete files)
235.08 KB,
patch
|
yuanyi21
:
review+
aaronlev
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
A lot of names in nsIAccessible have "acc" in them, e.g.:
GetAccFirstChild(), AccGetBounds(), GetAccActionName()
This bugs is to get rid of the "acc" - it's redundant since we're already using
nsIAccessible, e.g.:
GetFirstChild(), GetBounds(), GetActionName()
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 128854 [details] [diff] [review]
Remove "acc" from attrib and method names in nsIAccessible
looks great!
the "getFromXXX" method names are a bit odd to me - maybe you want
getLeftNode() or something? I think its "get from" that bothers me... anyhow,
sr=alecf on this because its good stuff, but if you want to change those
methods too, the sr= still applies.
Attachment #128854 -
Flags: superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
Okay, I'm going to put up a new patch though.
I found a problem when compiling under Linux:
nsIAccessible::GetParent, GetPreviousSibling, GetNextSibling, GetFirstChild,
GetLastChild all now conflict with the same method names in nsIAccessNode.
See,
nsAccessible inherits from nsAccessNode and implements both nsIAccessible and
nsIAccessNode.
Therefore, the method names need to be different -- they navigate relatived to
the accessible tree or the access node tree.
The architecture is documented here:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/ui/accessibility/accessible-architecture.html
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
Alec, wouldn't GetAccessibleFrom[Left/Right/Above/Below]() be better?
I'm concerned that if we use the term node people might forget that we're not
talking about DOM nodes.
Also, that way we we wouldn't end up with GetAboveNode(), which sounds strange
to me.
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
node/accessible/whatever, just as long as it isn't "acc" :)
My big issue with the word "accessible" is that its an adjective, not a noun..
but I guess that's maybe something for a different rewrite of these interfaces :)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
Alec, The term "accessible" has historically been used as a noun in
accessibility interfaces.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #128854 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
Attachment #128881 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
Attachment #128883 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #128887 -
Flags: superreview?(alecf)
Attachment #128887 -
Flags: review?(kyle.yuan)
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #128887 -
Flags: superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 128887 [details] [diff] [review]
Fixes last GCC warnings
Carried sr=alecf
Attachment #128887 -
Flags: superreview?(alecf)
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 128887 [details] [diff] [review]
Fixes last GCC warnings
I like the new name - less is more.
r=kyle
Attachment #128887 -
Flags: review?(kyle.yuan) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
thanks everyone. checked in.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•