Closed
Bug 219795
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Add menu item for address book
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Mail Window Front End, enhancement)
Thunderbird
Mail Window Front End
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
Thunderbird0.9
People
(Reporter: mozilla, Assigned: raccettura)
References
Details
(Keywords: access, fixed-aviary1.0)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
2.34 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Build Identifier: No menu item for address book. Thunderbird 0.3a Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
also a problem on mac, but since i'm not owner, i cannot change target hardware for this bug.
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
This is not a bug.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Why "not a bug"? This is bug!
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Hardware: PC → All
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
mozilla@dimentiy.info, why this is bug? "Address book menu" is moved to "Address book button in toolbar" and this is only a UI change of Thunderbird from Mozilla Mail&News. A word "bug" is generally used for defect/fault/flaw although all requests in Bugzilla is also called "bug". Asa says "this is not a defect". If your "bug" means "a valid bug in Bugzilla", changing "Severity=Enhancement", I think, is your appropriate action since your request is "design change". Please describe the reason why "Address book menu" is required in addition to "Address book button in toolbar". I guess you love keyboard only operation or you uses notebook PC and you are not a specialist in using touchpad/trackpoint/trackball like me :-) Isn't it right?
> Please describe the reason why "Address book menu" is required in addition to > "Address book button in toolbar". It's simple. 1) Toolbar is optional. For example, I am don't use toolbar. And toolbar is not visible on my configuration. 2) User may don't have mouse. > If your "bug" means "a valid bug in Bugzilla", > changing "Severity=Enhancement", IMHO, severity is "normal".
Updated•21 years ago
|
QA Contact: asa
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
In additions to comment 5, above: The toolbar is also customizable. This means that the Address book button can be removed from the toolbar, leaving no way to instatiate an AB window.
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
This is a enhancement request.
Severity: normal → enhancement
Summary: No menu item for address book → Add menu item for address book
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
We will unquestionably need a second patch, but to get this going.
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: mscott → robert
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 145663 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1 Scott, This ultimately comes down to you anyway... so I see 2 issues: 1. Positioning? Should I take "Search Addresses" and put that and "Address Book" between 2 separators as their own little section of the menu? Second obvious problem is the accesskey (we would now have 2 that use A)? Who wins? Other than that, only changes in this patch are spacing, because those long lines drive me nuts.
Attachment #145663 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #145663 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #145663 -
Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 250333 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
mscott: ping Can you look at this, it's pretty minor.
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
nominating for 1.0. from an accessibility p.o.v. it'd be great to have AB available in the menu, since the toolbar isn't keyboard accessible.
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9) > Second obvious problem is the accesskey (we would now have 2 that use A)? Who > wins? I would suggest B (Address _Book) or the first d (A_ddress Book). However, would it be possible to grab these access keys from an existing location so as to avoid localization issues? If not, how difficult would it be to localize this change? I'm tentatively nominating for PR, due to the possible l10n needs.
Flags: blocking-aviary1.0PR?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird0.9
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
scheduling for 0.9.
Flags: blocking-aviary1.0PR?
Flags: blocking-aviary1.0PR-
Flags: blocking-aviary1.0?
Flags: blocking-aviary1.0-
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #145663 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #145663 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
fixed branch and trunk
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago → 20 years ago
Keywords: fixed-aviary1.0
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 267144 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 259653 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•