Closed
Bug 225150
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
remove ununused setter/getter in overrideHandler.js
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: File Handling, defect)
Core Graveyard
File Handling
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: p_ch, Assigned: p_ch)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
7.40 KB,
patch
|
Biesinger
:
review+
bzbarsky
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
the setters/getter 'smallIconURL' and 'largeIconURL' are not used in the
codebase. While I was at it, I notice that the class .file-icon-large isn't used
neither, so that we can eventually cvs remove the files content-large.gif and
content-small.gif to your appreciation.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #135133 -
Flags: superreview?(bz-vacation)
Attachment #135133 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 135133 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v1.0
r=me (except the phoenix part because I'm no peer there, but I guess you don't
need review for that anyway)
Attachment #135133 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger) → review+
![]() |
||
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 135133 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v1.0
sr=bzbarsky
Attachment #135133 -
Flags: superreview?(bz-vacation) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Whao... the file handling task force in action... :)
should I cvs remove the files content-small.gif and content-large.gif?
![]() |
||
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
If they are not used elsewhere, yes. I see no reason to keep them, and if we
really need them later Attic is there.
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
yes, I agree
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
the FHTF strikes back... :)
these icons aren't used.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
fixed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•9 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•