231571 - No scrollbars when using Firebird through Remote Desktop

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 206435

(Firefox :: General, defect)

Description

[Dirkjan Ochtman (:djc)]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031015 Firebird/0.7 (aebrahim)
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031015 Firebird/0.7 (aebrahim)

When I login to my computer (Win XP Pro) using Remote Desktop, there are no
scrollbars in MozFirebird, even though I can still scroll using the arrows or
the scroll wheel. Annoying, though. I'm using the default theme.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login to your computer using Remote Desktop.
2. Open Mozilla Firebird.
3. Browse to a long page.

Actual Results:  
I can't see any scrollbars.

Expected Results:  
Show scrollbars.

Theme: default.

Comment 1

[Brian Ryner (not reading)]

Just to make sure, are you using WinXP on both the local and remote machines?

Comment 2

[Dirkjan Ochtman (:djc)]

I think the remote computer was on Windows 2000 Pro, but I'm not sure.

Comment 3

[Daniel Watt]

I have seen this bug as well. Computer with Firefox is XP, and accessing 
computer can be XP or 2000 (those are the only I have tested). However, I have 
a variant of the problem (that, or the original post did not go into full 
detail): If the Firefox window is already open (does not matter if it is 
maximized or not), then there will be no scrollbars. However, if I open a new 
Firefox window (either with CTRL-N or launching a separate copy of the 
application), then I do get scrollbars. The window that was open when the 
remote session started will not have scrollbars, and is the only window that 
does not have them.

Comment 4

[Dirkjan Ochtman (:djc)]

I can confirm this behavior: a newly opened window (through MSTSC) has
scrollbars, a window that was already open before I logged in through Remote
Desktop does not. Can anyone think of anything that could be causing this?

Comment 5

[Asa Dotzler [:asa]]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 206435 ***