Closed
Bug 23435
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Implement navigator.onLine
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, enhancement, P3)
Core
DOM: Core & HTML
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Future
People
(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: bzbarsky)
References
Details
(Keywords: dom0)
Attachments
(1 file)
3.08 KB,
patch
|
jst
:
review+
jst
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Offline use will eventually be included in Mozilla. So why not include a
property in the navigator object already now that states wheather Mozilla is
offline or online. IE has this
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/reference/properties/online.asp
)
It might as well be the same as in IE:
navigator.onLine
- TRUE is online
- FALSE if offline
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → LATER
Summary: Implement navigator.onLine → RFE: Implement navigator.onLine
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
We don't have offline browsing in 5.0 yet. All RFE's that probably won't be done
are going to be latered. Cc:ing Eric Krock if he wants to change the
designation. Sorry.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
Verified.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Since it's now possible to work Offline this bug should be easily fixed.
Status: VERIFIED → REOPENED
Resolution: LATER → ---
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
Hi Henrik -- Doesn't matter if it's the easiest "nice to have" in the world. All
"nice to have" enhancements are now FUTURE; Netscape does not have the resources
to work on "nice to haves" at this point. Reassigning to nobody@mozilla.org and
marking FUTURE. No Netscape resources will be allocated to this prior to
FCS. (Also, I think a policy needs to be defined explaining what kinds of info
will be exposed as navigator object properties; if we do this one, we could open
a Pandora's Box of other RFEs of this kind, so we need a rational policy
defined.)
Assignee: vidur → nobody
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Reporter | ||
Updated•24 years ago
|
Hardware: PC → All
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
RFE cleanup. RFE is already indicated by the Severity field...Sorry for the
spam!
Severity: normal → enhancement
Summary: RFE: Implement navigator.onLine → Implement navigator.onLine
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Again, is this something we want? This should be pretty simple to implement, if so.
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
Yeah, I'd have no problems with Mozilla supporting this.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #145971 -
Flags: superreview?(jst)
Attachment #145971 -
Flags: review?(jst)
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 145971 [details] [diff] [review]
Impl it
r+sr=jst
Attachment #145971 -
Flags: superreview?(jst)
Attachment #145971 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #145971 -
Flags: review?(jst)
Attachment #145971 -
Flags: review+
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
Fixed for 1.8a.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → bzbarsky
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•