Closed Bug 23435 Opened 25 years ago Closed 21 years ago

Implement navigator.onLine

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, enhancement, P3)

enhancement

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Future

People

(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: bzbarsky)

References

Details

(Keywords: dom0)

Attachments

(1 file)

Offline use will eventually be included in Mozilla. So why not include a property in the navigator object already now that states wheather Mozilla is offline or online. IE has this (http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/reference/properties/online.asp ) It might as well be the same as in IE: navigator.onLine - TRUE is online - FALSE if offline
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → LATER
Summary: Implement navigator.onLine → RFE: Implement navigator.onLine
We don't have offline browsing in 5.0 yet. All RFE's that probably won't be done are going to be latered. Cc:ing Eric Krock if he wants to change the designation. Sorry.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Verified.
Since it's now possible to work Offline this bug should be easily fixed.
Status: VERIFIED → REOPENED
Resolution: LATER → ---
Hi Henrik -- Doesn't matter if it's the easiest "nice to have" in the world. All "nice to have" enhancements are now FUTURE; Netscape does not have the resources to work on "nice to haves" at this point. Reassigning to nobody@mozilla.org and marking FUTURE. No Netscape resources will be allocated to this prior to FCS. (Also, I think a policy needs to be defined explaining what kinds of info will be exposed as navigator object properties; if we do this one, we could open a Pandora's Box of other RFEs of this kind, so we need a rational policy defined.)
Assignee: vidur → nobody
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Keywords: dom0
Hardware: PC → All
RFE cleanup. RFE is already indicated by the Severity field...Sorry for the spam!
Severity: normal → enhancement
Summary: RFE: Implement navigator.onLine → Implement navigator.onLine
Depends on: 23436
Again, is this something we want? This should be pretty simple to implement, if so.
Yeah, I'd have no problems with Mozilla supporting this.
Attached patch Impl itSplinter Review
Attachment #145971 - Flags: superreview?(jst)
Attachment #145971 - Flags: review?(jst)
Comment on attachment 145971 [details] [diff] [review] Impl it r+sr=jst
Attachment #145971 - Flags: superreview?(jst)
Attachment #145971 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #145971 - Flags: review?(jst)
Attachment #145971 - Flags: review+
Fixed for 1.8a.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee: nobody → bzbarsky
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: