Closed
Bug 243483
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
[FIX]realtime jprof has __restore_rt all over the profile results
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: General, defect, P1)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.8alpha1
People
(Reporter: bzbarsky, Assigned: bzbarsky)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
1.39 KB,
patch
|
shaver
:
review+
dbaron
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
<shaver> bz: it's part of glibc's signal handling code for realtime signals, IIRC
<shaver> are you using the rtc for profiling?
> yes
> I am
<shaver> mmmm, yes, yes
<shaver> I suspect there's an extra frame in place sometimes
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•21 years ago
|
Assignee: general → bzbarsky
Priority: -- → P1
Summary: realtime jprof has __restore_rt all over the profile results → [FIX]realtime jprof has __restore_rt all over the profile results
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.8alpha
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #148376 -
Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
Attachment #148376 -
Flags: review?(shaver)
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 148376 [details] [diff] [review]
Skip over the __restore_rt frames
I think that's fine, given the general state of that code. r=shaver.
Attachment #148376 -
Flags: review?(shaver) → review+
Comment on attachment 148376 [details] [diff] [review]
Skip over the __restore_rt frames
You could save the extra findSymbol call by moving the added code just inside
the |if(idx>=0)|, i.e., by comparing to externalSymbols[idx].name and then
decrementing and re-calling findSymbol if needed.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Attachment #148376 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 148396 [details] [diff] [review]
Do that
I was looking for something like that... ;)
Attachment #148396 -
Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
Attachment #148396 -
Flags: review?(shaver)
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #148376 -
Flags: superreview?(dbaron) → superreview-
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 148396 [details] [diff] [review]
Do that
Yes, indeed, even better. r=shaver.
Attachment #148396 -
Flags: review?(shaver) → review+
Attachment #148396 -
Flags: superreview?(dbaron) → superreview+
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
Fixed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•