Closed Bug 24822 Opened 25 years ago Closed 25 years ago

Incremental loading for text files

Categories

(Core :: Layout, enhancement, P3)

x86
Other
enhancement

Tracking

()

VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 39368

People

(Reporter: sitsofe, Assigned: buster)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: perf)

At the moment, Mozilla doesn't seem to support the incremental loading of text files. This is useful for very large pieces of text. I know most text loads quickly but on slow connections this could be handy.
Reproduced with: 2000-01-24-01-M13 nightly binary on Windows NT 4.0sp3. 2000-01-24-08-M14 nightly binary on Windows NT 4.0sp3. If text/html displays incrementally, text/plain should too, no? Changing component from "Browser-General" to "Layout", although this could be possibly "Networking".
Assignee: nobody → troy
Component: Browser-General → Layout
QA Contact: nobody → petersen
Everything should be incremental, but maybe there's something funny with the way text files work. Re-assigning to Kipp's bug list
Assignee: troy → kipp
*** Bug 25212 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
with asynch reflow enabled, this is pretty fast. I'll look into it further post beta.
Summary: Incremental loading for text files → [PERF] Incremental loading for text files
Target Milestone: M16
Adding perf keyword
Keywords: perf
Summary: [PERF] Incremental loading for text files → Incremental loading for text files
mine! mine mine mine! all mine! whoo-hoo!
Assignee: kipp → buster
moving non-critical bugs to M17
Target Milestone: M16 → M17
Has this been fixed? I notice that moz is now showing the page incremently even when the progress bar at the bottom is <100%... build: 2000060508 Linux
This is probably faster after Vidur's text related changes to the HTML content sink. Currently, we don't do async reflow during document load. Once that changes post beta 2, this page should become more incremental. I'll mark this bug a dup of bug 39368 (enable async reflow during doc load) which is currently assigned to me. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39368 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Verified duplicate.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.