Closed Bug 277885 Opened 21 years ago Closed 21 years ago

Some Textfields are spoken as "Undefined single line text".

Categories

(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)

x86
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: Louie.Zhao, Assigned: Louie.Zhao)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: sunport17)

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

Some Textfields are spoken as "Undefined single line text" because they have no "label" related to them. Steps to Repro: 1. Start Mozilla and Gnopernicus. 2. For the following textfields. Bug Observation: Textfields are spoken as "Undefined single line text". Cases: 1. In "Page Setup" on the "Margins & Header/Footer' Tab, the textfields for the margin values. 2. In preferences->Navigator->Helper Applications, "When Encountered" textfield. 3. In Preferences->Advanced, the textfield under the checkbox labelled "Send this email address as anonymous FTP password". 4. In Preferences->Advanced->Cache, the cache folder. 5. In Preferences->Advanced->Proxies, the textfield under the "Automatic proxy configuration URL" radio button. 6. In Preferences->Advanced->DOM inspector, the textfields. 7. In the Print window, click the properties button. The Print Command textfield.
Attached patch patch v1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
These changes mainly connect XUL label and textbox. After bug 257747 is fixed, the label accessible will be "related" to textbox accessible and make textbox accessible to have a reasonable name.
Attachment #170898 - Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Whiteboard: sunport17
Attached patch patch v2Splinter Review
Attachment #170898 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #170898 - Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Attachment #170899 - Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Comment on attachment 170899 [details] [diff] [review] patch v2 Simple and good.
Attachment #170899 - Flags: superreview?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk)
Attachment #170899 - Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Attachment #170899 - Flags: review+
Comment on attachment 170899 [details] [diff] [review] patch v2 Should any of these labels get access keys?
Attachment #170899 - Flags: superreview?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk) → superreview+
(In reply to comment #4) > (From update of attachment 170899 [details] [diff] [review] [edit]) > Should any of these labels get access keys? As for the print dialogs see my patch in bug 277296 (which I need to update when this bug is fixed).
Thanks r & sr. Patch checked in.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: