Closed
Bug 277885
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Some Textfields are spoken as "Undefined single line text".
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: Louie.Zhao, Assigned: Louie.Zhao)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: sunport17)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
8.29 KB,
patch
|
aaronlev
:
review+
neil
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Some Textfields are spoken as "Undefined single line text" because they have no
"label" related to them.
Steps to Repro:
1. Start Mozilla and Gnopernicus.
2. For the following textfields.
Bug Observation:
Textfields are spoken as "Undefined single line text".
Cases:
1. In "Page Setup" on the "Margins & Header/Footer' Tab, the textfields for the
margin values.
2. In preferences->Navigator->Helper Applications, "When Encountered" textfield.
3. In Preferences->Advanced, the textfield under the checkbox labelled "Send
this email address as anonymous FTP password".
4. In Preferences->Advanced->Cache, the cache folder.
5. In Preferences->Advanced->Proxies, the textfield under the "Automatic proxy
configuration URL" radio button.
6. In Preferences->Advanced->DOM inspector, the textfields.
7. In the Print window, click the properties button. The Print Command textfield.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
These changes mainly connect XUL label and textbox. After bug 257747 is fixed,
the label accessible will be "related" to textbox accessible and make textbox
accessible to have a reasonable name.
Attachment #170898 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•21 years ago
|
Whiteboard: sunport17
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Attachment #170898 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #170898 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #170899 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 170899 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v2
Simple and good.
Attachment #170899 -
Flags: superreview?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk)
Attachment #170899 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Attachment #170899 -
Flags: review+
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 170899 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v2
Should any of these labels get access keys?
Attachment #170899 -
Flags: superreview?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk) → superreview+
![]() |
||
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> (From update of attachment 170899 [details] [diff] [review] [edit])
> Should any of these labels get access keys?
As for the print dialogs see my patch in bug 277296 (which I need to update when
this bug is fixed).
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Thanks r & sr. Patch checked in.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•