278873 - debugging switch-statement causes assertion

Status: VERIFIED FIXED

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect, P2)

Description

[Philipp Vogt]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20050117 Firefox/0.10.1

I tried to debug the following javascript-code with jsshell (compiled on the 
Firefox-1.0PR with the DEBUG-FLAG):

tracing(true);
function SwitchTest( input) {
    switch ( input ) {
        default:   break;
        case A:    break;
    }
}

This raises an assertion:

js> tracing(true);
   1: 00008:  popv
  inputs: tracing(true) @ 1
  stack:
js> function SwitchTest( input) {
    switch ( input ) {
        default:   break;
        case A:    break;
    }
}
   2: 00000:  deffunAssertion failure: nbytes != 0, at jsapi.c:1459

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. compile jsshell with DEBUG-Flag
2. jsshell.exe
3. copy-paste the sourcecode





Speculation:

The error seems to be caused by jsopcode.c line 2054+ (case JSOP_CONDSWITCH). 
Especially:
>                sn = js_GetSrcNote(jp->script, pc);
                JS_ASSERT(sn && SN_TYPE(sn) == SRC_SWITCH);
                len = js_GetSrcNoteOffset(sn, 0);
>                off = js_GetSrcNoteOffset(sn, 1);

off becomes 0, so does off2 and so ncases is 0 and then 

                table = (TableEntry *) JS_malloc(cx, (size_t)ncases * sizeof 
*table);

mallocs 0 bytes which raises an exception.

Comment 1

[Brendan Eich [:brendan]]

Attachment: fix for ancient JSOP_CONDSWITCH bug

Goes back to norris, IIRC.  Shaver, what do you think?
/be

Comment 2

[Mike Shaver (:shaver emeritus)]

Comment on attachment 172336 [details] [diff] [review]
fix for ancient JSOP_CONDSWITCH bug

r=shaver.  I haven't yet lost all recollection of norris' great switch/case
ECMA-conformance rewrite, indeed.

Comment 3

[Brendan Eich [:brendan]]

Fixed.

/be

Comment 4

[Bob Clary [:bc] (inactive)]

Attachment: js1_5/Regress/regress-278873.js

Philipp, is it ok to include your test case in the javascript test library?

Comment 5

[Philipp Vogt]

?! Wow! Sure do whatever you want with it (isn't the best code I've written so 
far :-)). And thx, I'm honored.

Comment 6

[Bob Clary [:bc] (inactive)]

js1_5/Regress/regress-278873.js checked in.

Comment 7

[Bob Clary [:bc] (inactive)]

verified fixed 1.8.x and trunk.