Closed Bug 305357 Opened 20 years ago Closed 20 years ago

bump SeaMonkey version for trunk to post-1.0

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: General, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED

People

(Reporter: kairo, Assigned: kairo)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

Currently, both 1.8 branch and trunk version of SeaMonkey report "1.0a" as the version number, but that's only correct for branch, trunk is headed to some post-1.0 stage already... To avoid confusion, we should bump the version on trunk to something more fitting. As we haven't decided yet what our 1.9-based version will be called, we should probably be conservative and go for the lowest possible post-1.0 version number, being 1.1a (we can always bump up again later, correcting to a lower version later might be worse, up is no real problem).
Stephend, sorry to say that, but the patch you attached is the likely most insignificant place where we need to change it ;-) Anyways, doing the patch is the easy part here, the hard part is to get all of the SeaMonkey Council to agree to one number to change it to ;-)
hmm, can't that file use some automated way to get the version? (I'd also pick 1.1a)
Heh, I figured it was too simple to be true ;-) Anyway, I shouldn't be stealing your thunder, as you assigned this bug to yourself ;-(.
(In reply to comment #2) > Anyways, doing the patch is the easy part here, the hard part is to get all of > the SeaMonkey Council to agree to one number to change it to ;-) v1.0+ could be possible too, but v1.1a seems just fine (to avoid confusion). As a reminder, getting a Target Milestone in BugZilla would be good then.
(In reply to comment #3) > hmm, can't that file use some automated way to get the version? It can, but it needs a patvh nearly as big as the one I did for enabling @MOZ_APP_DISPLAYNAME@ in there... the other (non-string) version number can't be automated that easily though, unfortunately (at least from what I know)... (In reply to comment #5) > v1.0+ could be possible too, but v1.1a seems just fine (to avoid confusion). Nah, we want to avoid those '+' versions if possible in any way. > As a reminder, getting a Target Milestone in BugZilla would be good then. Target Milestone entry will only be necessary as soon as we have decided on how our post-1.0 milestones will be called. Thanks for reminding, but it doesn't really make sense yet...
Attached patch bump to 1.1aSplinter Review
OK, here's a patch that bumps us to 1.1a on trunk.
Attachment #193315 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #193811 - Flags: superreview?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk)
Attachment #193811 - Flags: review?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk)
Comment on attachment 193811 [details] [diff] [review] bump to 1.1a >Index: mozilla/xpfe/bootstrap/module.ver >=================================================================== >RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/xpfe/bootstrap/module.ver,v >retrieving revision 1.4 >diff -u -7 -p -r1.4 module.ver >--- mozilla/xpfe/bootstrap/module.ver 27 Jul 2005 23:27:56 -0000 1.4 >+++ mozilla/xpfe/bootstrap/module.ver 25 Aug 2005 14:26:38 -0000 >@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ > WIN32_MODULE_COMPANYNAME=mozilla.org > WIN32_MODULE_COPYRIGHT=©Mozilla Developers, according to the MPL 1.1/GPL 2.0/LGPL 2.1 licenses, as applicable. >-WIN32_MODULE_PRODUCTVERSION=1,0,0,0 >-WIN32_MODULE_PRODUCTVERSION_STRING=1.0a >+WIN32_MODULE_PRODUCTVERSION=1,1,0,0 >+WIN32_MODULE_PRODUCTVERSION_STRING=1.1a > WIN32_MODULE_TRADEMARKS=SeaMonkey and Mozilla are trademarks of The Mozilla Foundation. > WIN32_MODULE_DESCRIPTION=@MOZ_APP_DISPLAYNAME@ > WIN32_MODULE_PRODUCTNAME=@MOZ_APP_DISPLAYNAME@ > WIN32_MODULE_NAME=@MOZ_APP_DISPLAYNAME@ >Index: mozilla/xpfe/bootstrap/version.txt >=================================================================== >RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/xpfe/bootstrap/version.txt,v >retrieving revision 1.1 >diff -u -7 -p -r1.1 version.txt >--- mozilla/xpfe/bootstrap/version.txt 2 Jul 2005 20:35:11 -0000 1.1 >+++ mozilla/xpfe/bootstrap/version.txt 25 Aug 2005 14:26:38 -0000 >@@ -1 +1 @@ >-1.0a >\ No newline at end of file >+1.1a >\ No newline at end of file
Attachment #193811 - Flags: superreview?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk)
Attachment #193811 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #193811 - Flags: review?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk)
Attachment #193811 - Flags: review+
Checked in.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20050826 SeaMonkey/1.1a] (nightly) (W98SE) V.Fixed
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: