Closed
Bug 31431
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
Cyrus IMAP Inbox "1st level folders" disappear problem
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Message Display, defect, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
WORKSFORME
M17
People
(Reporter: huang, Assigned: jefft)
References
Details
(Keywords: imap-interop, Whiteboard: [nsbeta2+])
Used 03-10-13-M15 commercial build:
Cyrus IMAP Inbox "1st level folders" disappear problem
Setup info & steps:
1) Create cyrus new profile by using today build.
2) First login without setup IMAP Advanced dialog for "Inbox."
3) All the 1st level folders of Inbox seemed to display this time.
4) But after setup the IMAP Advanced dialog for "Inbox." and login again
5) Actual Results: The 1st level folders of Inbox just disappear
Expected Results: Should display 1st level folders of Inbox completely.
Addtional Info: I did check the IMAP log, all the folders are there:
(Jeff saw this problem today, too and it's reproducible)
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:SendData: 4 lsub "" "Inbox.*"
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.Drafts
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "." Inbox.In_3
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.In_3.in_3_1
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.In_3.in_3_1.in_311
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.In_3.in_3_1.in_311.in_3111
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "." Inbox.Sent
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.Templates
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.Trash
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "." Inbox.bf1
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.bf1.bf1_1
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.cyrus_f1
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.cyrus_f1.cyrus_f11
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.cyrus_f1.cyrus_f11.cyrus_f111
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.cyrus_f1.cyrus_f11.cyrus_f111.cyrus_f1111
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.cyrus_f1.cyrus_f2
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.cyrus_f1.cyrus_f2.cyrus_f21
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.cyrus_f1.cyrus_f2.cyrus_f21.cy_f211
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "." Inbox.g.h
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "." Inbox.in_1
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "." Inbox.in_2
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "." Inbox.in_4
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.in_f4
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.in_f4.in_f4_1
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.in_f4.in_f4_1.in_f4_1_1
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LSUB () "."
Inbox.in_f4.in_f4_1.in_f4_1_1.in_f4_1_1_1
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 4 OK Completed
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:SendData: 5 list "" "INBOX"
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LIST () "." INBOX
284[b59ca80]: buggy.mcom.com:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 5 OK Completed
| Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
QA Contact: lchiang → huang
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
Raising Priority to P2, change Serverity to "blocker" since I cannot delete msgs
to trash folder if this bug not get fixed. Beta1?
Severity: normal → blocker
Priority: P3 → P2
Karen - "blocker" means you cannot test a feature at all across the entire
component. With other folders, we are able to test deleting msgs.
If this is specific to the Cyrus server? Is this a regression (ie. was this
working before)?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
Yes. Should be regression. Adding pp, Change serverity from blocker to major.
Severity: blocker → major
Keywords: pp
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
Jeff, do you think this should be fixed in beta1?
Since problem still occurring on today's beta1 commercial build.....
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
Adding beta 1 on the keywords.
Let PDT team to decide this is PDT+ or PDT- for beta1.
Keywords: beta1
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
If I had to guess... I'd say it is too late. If there was an incredibly simple
fix in hand... then it might have had a chance... but by the time the PDT meets
on Monday, I think the time will be gone.
Beta 1 is almost in the can now... so changes are not likely.
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
Mass moving to M16 to get these off the M15 radar. Please let me know if this
is really an M15 stopper.
Target Milestone: M15 → M16
| Reporter | ||
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 36772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
| Reporter | ||
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
Based on PDT team & Phil's comments from bug#36772.
Updating the whiteboard & keywords for nsbeta2+ bug!!
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
Mass moving M16 to M17 - look for nsbeta2 before anything else.
Target Milestone: M16 → M17
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
adding interop keyword so we can track our interop bugs easily for mail connect.
Whiteboard: [nsbeta2+] → [nsbeta2+],interop
Comment 15•25 years ago
|
||
correcting to keyword
Keywords: interop
Whiteboard: [nsbeta2+],interop → [nsbeta2+]
| Assignee | ||
Comment 16•25 years ago
|
||
Karen, can you try this again? This seems working fine for me with today's
build.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 17•25 years ago
|
||
Yes. I already verified -- no problem now!!
Jeff, you can mark workforme now...since it's no problem for today's build.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 18•25 years ago
|
||
Cool. One more down.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
| Reporter | ||
Comment 19•25 years ago
|
||
Sounds like IMAP interop beta2 is better than beta1!!
I am wondering to know whether this is because you fix the namespace bug so fix
this as well?? Marking as verified anyway!!
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
| Reporter | ||
Comment 20•25 years ago
|
||
Hmm.... it shouldn't because namespace...maybe someother UI bug fixed!!
Updated•21 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•