Closed
Bug 37567
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
pref to disable position: fixed
Categories
(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, enhancement, P3)
Core
CSS Parsing and Computation
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
WONTFIX
Future
People
(Reporter: gmiller, Assigned: dbaron)
Details
(Whiteboard: WONTFIX?)
position: fixed allows web designers to recreate the most annoying aspect of frames without actually using frames... It'd be really nice to have a pref to treat position: fixed as position: absolute.
Updated•24 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Updated•24 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
I vote we WONTFIX this bug. The vastly overwhelming majority of users will have no need for such a pref. I don't really even understand what the problem with position:fixed is, to be honest. If this is really an issue, you could write a javascript bookmarklet which scanned the stylesheets of the document and replaced instances of "fixed" with "absolute". But I doubt you will ever need it. Our prefs are overloaded as it is. We don't need more.
Assignee: matt → dbaron
Component: Preferences → Style System
QA Contact: sairuh → ian
Whiteboard: WONTFIX?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
position: fixed shrinks the scrollable area. From a user perspective, it's annoying in exactly the same way frames are.
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
position: fixed isnt what you want to disable to counter frame like effects, its overflow: (scroll|auto) anyway, frame like layouts can be nice. the problem is that frames prevent URLs pointing to a particular page. anyway, there is a billion and one more annoying things you can use than position: fixed. i vote WONTFIX
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
I'm going to agree with WONTFIX here, too. After all, if you find frames annoying, frames are still much more common than fixed positioning. And did I mention we have too many prefs already? ->WONTFIX
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
20 years after WONTFIXing this feature, I wonder if it'd be reasonable to reconsider. The WWW world has changed in the two decades, and today most pages consist of tens of megabytes of javascript, making once-up fixup in an extension not really workable.
Having been hit by a yet another page that has over half of the vertical screen real estate taken by an useless position:fixed header (tested only on mobile chrome?) I'd be thankful if we could make such headers scroll away.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•